Universities provide a new environment of learning and education for students who are interested in different subjects. In fact, they can build and secure their future career by studying in universities. However, they should be noticed that treatment would have happened If they waste their time by distracting themselves through study different major coinciding. The Idea of taking history courses accompany the major course is not convincing for me. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First and for most, considering the limited duration of major courses study, Students should avoid themselves from the disturbance fact which causes them to waste their valuable time. On the other hand, it is obvious that learners are already under pressure due to accomplished their major course. Therefore, it would be better If they spend their low free period spend with some physical activities which are significantly helpful to overcome with the pressures of their major instead of study historical courses which are kind of dulling. The recent research among this issue which assesses the results of studying historical course coincide with study the main major culminated in that student get bored and the quality of their study diminished over the course of study.
Second, it is the consequential responsibility for every educated youngster to keep their mind forward and push their mind to just control the futures, not the past. In this respect, studying a historical course, which discusses our heritage, languages, and ultimately the events that happened in the past leads students to spend less energy to make a plan for futures and development. One of my own experiences is a good case in point. During my educational time in university, our admissions team decided to offer the historical course as a credited course along with other Couse. What was quite exhausted for me and distracted me from my futures plan was that I had to spend extra time research special events which were happened in the past.
In conclusion, I firmly disagree with the statements of studying historical courses with the main major at the same time. It does not only lets students get on bored and waste their time but also gives students take more attention to the past instead of futures.
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...events which were happened in the past. In conclusion, I firmly disagree with th...
^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'let'
Suggestion: let
...ajor at the same time. It does not only lets students get on bored and waste their t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10789473684 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7038638097 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534210526316 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8975964296 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3125 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215335827225 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758773885009 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463302142402 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146921541348 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453985798511 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.