Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a shadow of a doubt, there are great deals of courses that can benefit young adults to some degree in many aspects. The point here is to choose the topics that can be more benefical and instructive for students. With this in mind, I thinks history course, at least some of them, are of utmost importance for any university student who is going to be an elite person in society. Thus they should be mandatory for all individuals in higher education. I believe this based on several easons, which I will elaborate on in what follows.
The first and most important reason is that there are huge amount of leasons in history that can increase students' wisodm. However, the complexity of sories in history books are always in high level, so students will not be able to effectively study those readings in order to gain knowledge. In this line of though, it is better for students to learn those mentioned lesson from lecturers while attending classes. This is mostly owing to the fact that history professors are excellent in teaching those materials and will effeciently derive lessons from historical events. Take my own experience as a compelling example. Since I am very interested in history, I have tried to read history books many times in my life. Finding those books boring, I have never been successful to complete those books. I was stuck in that problem until I took a history course in university. That course was really amazing because I learned a lot of things there and I was also able to concentrate on the lectures without getting bored in the course. That was all because of the professor of the course. No better way of learning historic lessons can I find.
Secondly, students should include some history courses in order to be away from their specialized courses. Many experts recommend that it is good for students to have a wide range of topics in their curriculum. This will either improve their creativity skills and make them learn about other topics. There has been many times in history of science that researchers have been able to find solutions for their problems by incorporating the knowledge of other fields. For instance, last year I was struggling with a problem in my part-time job. Actually, I was failing in getting peace with one of my competitors. A lesson from my history course gave me a point to solve that problem. That point was that some countries in wars just give a prize to their enemies to get peace. I used it for my work.
To summerize, I think it is very useful for students to take courses in history to learn about the important lesson in the historical events and also use it as a way of activating new parts in their brain because of the fact that it is ultimately different from their own field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...tive for students. With this in mind, I thinks history course, at least some of them, ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...going to be an elite person in society. Thus they should be mandatory for all indivi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...important reason is that there are huge amount of leasons in history that can increase...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... of activating new parts in their brain because of the fact that it is ultimately different from their o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, at least, for instance, i think, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68930041152 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56559280144 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495884773663 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1760929407 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6538461538 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65384615385 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200308182512 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055437235913 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432604752055 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134902253605 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021323917836 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.