Do you agree or disagree with the following statement ?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.
Some people argue that under some specific circumstances one can lie in their relationship with the motive of safeguarding their partners. However, I firmly believe that always telling the truth is the most significant aspect in any relationship and to support my opinion, I will provide two reasons in subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, to prolong any relationship, trust among the partners is a must. Without developing trust among each other they cannot enjoy or even tolerate each other’s company. This trust is not develop overnight. When partners are truthful to each other in every circumstances and about every aspect of their life, this trust start to develop between them. I must admit that my opinion is based on my own personal experience. I married my wife after dating her for 10 years. At the start of our relationship, we were unsure about your compatibility as partners. But, as we slowly started to open up with each other, keeping truthfulness as a key to our relationship, we decided to step up to next level. And now I am a happily married man. So, to protect any relationship one should always speak the truth.
Another reason why I feel truth is important consideration in any relationship is due to fact that lying leads to conflicts. Drawing from my personal experience, relationship of my co-worker and his wife ended with an unpleasant and long court trial. My friend is a habitual liar. He lies on every situation to save his skin from consequences of his wrong decision. Not only did he lie in his workplace but he also lied to his wife regarding his gambling habits and debts. After seven years of marriage, his wife couldn’t take anymore and dragged him to court for divorce. In present society, there are abundance of divorce cases stacked in the court that began with partners not being truthful to each other.
To conclude, I definitely think that to be in a fruitful and healthy relationship, one must understand the essence of truth in their relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | Simin_MB | 83 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
- Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested Those critics would like the traditional systems 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first time 60
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 88
- Eco certified Wood Products 83
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
...each other’s company. This trust is not develop overnight. When partners are truthful t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90423268249 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567647058824 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4015329912 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199589459565 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597916958766 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732204876924 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12949116567 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371116041056 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.