Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that telling the truth in each situation is crucial even in any relationship between people. The truth is one of the most reality which omitted in the nowadays life. Every people likes to tell the truth in each situation, but people are avoided by thinking about their mercenary world. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concerns, people differ greatly on their attitudes towards this question “must they telling the truth in any relationship?”. A host of people from one camp are in the conviction that they must answer the mentioned question with “yes”. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another camp embracing the view that can’t do in the same way. Where I to choose between these options, I would take the side of telling the truth in relationships. I think this way because of two of the main reasons which will be discussed in the following essay. The first one is that people mentality and the second one is strengthening our relationship.
First of all, I strongly believe that telling the truth can compel people not only to respect us but also to make amends on their mind about us. All of the people like the truth and every person who tells the truth. Therefore, they confide and try to respect them. Our ethical easily influence others mentality. For example, people who judge others should be a truth teller because if their judgments not true, others have not any respect and confidence in them.
Another reason which should not go unnoticed is telling the truth for strengthening our relationships. In each country with each culture, people, in the relationship, emphasize on it. I think that if in my relationship which I have with my family, wife, or friends, I understand they don’t tell the truth to me, this event cause to making me seriously nervousness and even I divorce our relation.
To put all into the nutshell, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to telling truth in relations. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since not only telling the truth can improve people mentality, but also strengthening our relationships. In the end, I express my agreement with the idea mentioned at the beginning of this essay and suggests authorities conduct a survey to investigate other crucial effects of telling truth in each position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 73
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
... to make amends on their mind about us. All of the people like the truth and every person ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, first of all, in the same way, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02153110048 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94890304452 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4371065092 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.95 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205266303607 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684001102872 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364207462573 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130990002283 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423889622238 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.