Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Traveling in a group is one of the popular options for people today, since they can put less efforts on the preparation of a trip. However, traveling by ourselves provides more merits other than convenience. Thus, I do not agree with the statement that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
To begin with, it is understandable that people now prefer to travel in a group. Since people today spend more time on their work, so they usually do not have time to plan a trip. And traveling in group provides a good solution, it helps people save the time spent on researching and planing. For example, there are many travel agencies today provide enormous plans for customers. Customers can choose their own plan depending on their budget, and no matter which kind of plan, the tour guide would bring tourist to famous sightseeing spots of a country.
However, traveling in a group may not be as flexible as traveling alone. The reason is that, the tour guides have to consider the group's benefits when they are leading a group. Thus, tourists who travel in groups may not be able to go to the place they like, or stay in bed until they are fully awake. Yet traveling by ourselves can avoid this situation. For instance, I remember when I was traveling in a group in Thailand, I always had to wake up at seven a.m., which is super early for me. But considering there are other tourists in the group, I had no choice but waking up early. In contrast, when I traveled to Korea with my friend, I could sleep until I want to wake up, since we can control our pace for traveling.
Another merit in traveling without a group is that we can understand a place's culture more deeply. Different from having a tour guide that arrange everything for you, traveling alone often requires asking for help from local residents. I remember while I was in Korea, I went to a temple that was not popular to the tourists. Therefore, there were no guide about the temple, and I had to talk to the residents there to learn the history of it. And since I was not traveling with a group, I had abundant time to talk to them.
In conclusion, though traveling in a group can help as save abundant of time, traveling by ourselves can allow us to see the real appearance of a country, hence, it makes the whole trip more interesting.
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum or P ramorum was first detected in the forests of the western United States P ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees in many infected oaks leaves wither rapidly la 78
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 80
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp fishing boats When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe and they die Some people suggest that this p 80
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ns for people today, since they can put less efforts on the preparation of a trip. H...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48356807512 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51149136616 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4265625443 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9523809524 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236012045352 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857421032649 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964970416307 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147464785295 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717435139372 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.