Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to pay'?
Suggestion: to pay
...n the other words, traveler do not need pay money for some things such as petroleum...
^^^
Line 6, column 169, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun place seems to be countable; consider using: 'many places'.
Suggestion: many places
...ur leaders is jobs that must know about many place, they have better information about cit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 258, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'sees'.
Suggestion: sees
...ties which people want to see. Traveler see the special place so that they are real...
^^^
Line 6, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enjoyed'.
Suggestion: enjoyed
...e special place so that they are really enjoy their trip. A quite clear example would...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 445, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...h special tour and our tour leaders had acknowledge about jungles. Thus, owing to having in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 445, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...h special tour and our tour leaders had acknowledge about jungles. Thus, owing to having in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Tour
... prefer go to travel with tour leaders. tour leaders not only have good information ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, so, therefore, thus, as for, as to, i think, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70588235294 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47422585643 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510695187166 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2480810991 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5217391304 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2608695652 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155044781388 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553124228414 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415659082769 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107342801836 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018992331061 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.