Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
With the popularization of transportation such as airplanes and high-speed trains, people often travel to some foreign places in order to get relax and learn about the local cultural. Some people prefer to go to a new place with the counselor. Others hold the view that travel on their own is better than the previous way. As far as I am concerned, I am completely agreed with the former view because of some reasons as below.
To begin with, the most important role of a tour conductor is to provide a lot of convenience for our travelling. To be more specific, the necessary supplies such as travel plans, comfortable hotel and delicious meals are provided in detail by the trip advisor so that tourists will be able to enjoy a happy journey owing to the considerate arrangement of the guide. On the contrary, there would be a tough time for people to find some tourist attractions or famous shops without the help of the guide when travelers are entirely in a strange environment. For example, I once went to the Badaling Great wall, the guide not only planned the route of climbing the wall, but also bought tickets. In this case, I enjoyed the beautiful scenery rather than wasting time looking for the path. Hence, a tour guide brings a lot of help to individuals’ trip.
Moreover, a tour guide can give citizens a good deal of useful information about the scenery. There are some historical landscapes where some famous events happened in the past. Visitors could clearly understand those events through the careful explain of the adviser. By contrast, if visitors do not have a guide within their trip, they may not realize those historical reasons and the best part of the trip would be missed by them. For instance, the country China accompanied with a history of 5,000 years has many cultural relics left over. If the tourists go to some momentary places to visit relics by themselves, they might feel like looking at some broken jars and bottles without any introductions by a guidance. Therefore, the counselor can provide sightseers with the cultural background of many scenic spots.
Last but not least, there are many safety concerns when traveling alone. If visitors had a journey personally instead of joining a group, they would need to pay more attention to their property safety as well as personal security rather than the attractive landscapes. However, the guide will ensure the safety of each person who join the group and make sure they are fully serviced. Under this circumstance, visitors can spend their time on the trip itself to enjoy the precious moment and get both physical and mentally relaxed instead of wasting so many times on things that is unavoidable to themselves such as security and personal safety but redundant for the trip.
To sum up, there are good reasons to support the view that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. In my opinion, a tour guide can bring more convenience and safety environment than traveling by ourselves.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 50
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 90
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the points that cloud seeding may have been effective in protecting crops from hail mentioned in the reading passage 80
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge artificial reefs made in the reading passage 80
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the points that what might have caused the odd sounds mentioned in the reading passage 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80657640232 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63859139476 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514506769826 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5406972329 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.043478261 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4782608696 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69565217391 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21106794522 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615098058344 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605730326772 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131864309196 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819926131077 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.