Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In the modern era, education is regarded as a crucial factor contributing to the thriving of people in various facets of their individual and social lives. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the caliber of the courses that each student has to take during his/her tutelage period. Many people adhere to the view that it is more beneficial to take different courses in various fields, while others prefer to step into the path of becoming specialists in a single subject. Ego, when it come to my stance, by weighing up the pros and cons, I firmly hold that studying deep about a subject is a more suitable choice. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that profound study of a subject increases our experiences so that we have more to offer in the future. When we are going to sign up for an occupation, we have to deliver a relevant resume including the activities we have done in that field. Accordingly, the bigger our resume is, the higher our chances are for acquiring the profession. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. During this summer, I was looking for professors in various universities who had the same research interests as I have. Because I took my courses in a way to become a specialist in computer architecture, I was considered as a more suitable candidate for their laboratories than other students whose majors were just computer science. Thus, I believe not having taken those courses, I could not have been accepted for those positions.

Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that we have to consider the fact that each course we take, occupy a certain capacity of our minds. If we just pick everything that appears in our way to be versatile, not only did we stuff our mind with trivial matters, but also we wasted our precsious time for the things that we are not going to use in our future. For instace, last year, I had to take a mathematically sophisticated mandatory course which was unrelated to my major. I put a considerable time on that course to get a convenient grade because it had a massive effect on my average. However, I could not focus on my more vital courses so that their final outcome were not as good as I expected. Thus, I believe I wasted my time and energy on something that I'm not going to use in the future.

In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that going deep into a subject yields to better results. This is becasue we have a lot to offer for our future jobs, also we do not lean useless matters that will not be adapted in our future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 508, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...lists in a single subject. Ego, when it come to my stance, by weighing up the pros a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ed my time and energy on something that Im not going to use in the future. In b...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, while, as to, in brief

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.729163486 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508333333333 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0709610836 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0888052881343 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299488280352 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281428153635 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662025532126 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316195347695 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.