Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is better to read books on an electronic device than it is to read traditional books on paper?”
Technology is growing faster than I expected, a few years ago there was no i-pad, tablet or electronic devices that designed especially for reading books but now there are hundreds of variety of devices invented to make our life easier than ever. These innovations eliminating the heavy weights, too small or too big text height et cetera. Therefore, in my opinion, I would choose electronic devices for reading books and paper because of its advantages. I have three reason why I agree with the statement that it is better to read books on an electronic device that it is to read traditional books on paper.
First of all, most interesting books have pages about hundred to three hundreds and weighting about 300 grams. However, this is the weight of only one book, but if there are about two to three books total weight going to be 600-900 grams which is relatively heavier to carry around. Also, about the volume, these three books would not fit into small handbag so that the bag should be bigger to fit those. Hence, reading interesting books while traveling or working will take a lot of effort. In this situation, electronic book solved this situation by eliminating heavy weight and spacious volume. For this reason, I would prefer to have electronic books than traditional printed books.
Secondly, sometimes when I go to the bookstore I struggled to fine nice books that have a optimum script size but in most occasion it is too big or too small to read. Like the electronic device solved books un-affordable size, it is also solving the issue of un-readable script. In electronic book, the script height, color or even background color can be customized. By doing this, even elders can read books without glasses.
Last but not least, in my opinion, printed books require to use both hand and sometimes during night special light should be illuminated to read the text properly. However, in electronic device, there are no need of special light or extra hand support to turn the pages. For example, when I was reading fascinating novel with over 500 pages, there was no free hand my both hand was used to read that book, and of course at evening, I had to go the place with light but if I had electronic book, I would read the novel while I am in bus or in my bed. Henceforth, simplifying the everyday life, I would say that reading on electronic device is much better.
In conclusion, comparing to the advantages of electronic book and printed book, I would hundred percent agree with the statement that it is better to read books on an electronic device that it is to read traditional books on paper.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-19 | soji_kab@hotmail.com | 61 | view |
- 1 The graphs below show the opening and closure and the types of magazines that opened in Southern Europe between 1995 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack suppor because of their parents absence 56
- Discussion about online encyclopedia and traditional encyclopedia's advantages and disadvantages 78
- Some items (such as clothes or furniture) can be made by hand or by machine. Which do you prefer: items made by hand or items made by machine? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice. 70
- The chart below shows the average percentages of typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...most interesting books have pages about hundred to three hundreds and weighting about 3...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...ok solved this situation by eliminating heavy weight and spacious volume. For this reason, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... struggled to fine nice books that have a optimum script size but in most occasio...
^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...t, in my opinion, printed books require to use both hand and sometimes during night sp...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ectronic book and printed book, I would hundred percent agree with the statement that i...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percent agree with the statement that it is better to read books on an electronic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74398249453 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57316274042 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463894967177 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3287559212 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.105263158 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0526315789 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443472397021 0.236089414692 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161370661236 0.076458572812 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147809981407 0.0737576698707 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311093947491 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14693997449 0.0645574589148 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.