Some people believe that the group studying is a effective studying method compared to studying alone. However, in my opinion, studying alone is more effective than to study in a group thanks to time efficiency and stress management.
To begin with, studying alone can help people to save time. If a group plan to study together in specific place, the members of the group have to reassign their schedules to participate the group-studying. In contrast, study alone in a comfortable place such as home is more effective to manage peoples’ time-table. For example, when I was in my university years, I joined a study group to develop my writing skill. However, due to the groups’ hard training, the memebers of the group demanded to gather over 12 hours a week. I thought that requirement is not appropriate and signed out the group. However, after constant efforts that I made every evening for 30 minutes, my writing skill had increased siginificantly and I also achieved a good score in many writing assignments.
On top of that, studying alone can reduce peoples’ stress level. Participating in a group to study results in comparisons between the members within the group. Some people who have inferior abilities than other memebers tend to feel the stress. As time goes by, the stress surpasses origin benefits of the group-studying and gives negative consequnces to the inferior members. For example, as I have mentioned, I participated in a group to study to increase my academic writing. One of member in that group was a master-degree student, who have majored Korean literature when he was a undergraduate. He sometimes used extremely complex words and sophiscated sentence structures, so that I felt inferiority for myself comparing my poor writing skill with his tremendous one. After quitting the comparison, however, I genuinely could develop my writing having a daily satisfaction of a continuing progression.
To sum up, if someone study alone, he can manage his time well and can reduce stress from a comparison with someone eles. Therefore, I insist that studying alone is better than study in a group.
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough on more serious duties and obligations Use your specific reasons and examples to support your answer 89
- The knowledge we gain from personal experience is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lecture Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussion Which do you prefer 73
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 60
- Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ople believe that the group studying is a effective studying method compared to s...
^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e majored Korean literature when he was a undergraduate. He sometimes used extrem...
^
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'studies'.
Suggestion: studies
...ng progression. To sum up, if someone study alone, he can manage his time well and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08857142857 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00641626784 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8614989972 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7368421053 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352476035868 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13790763686 0.076458572812 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111056827848 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278119480986 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900310884591 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.