Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and example to support answer.
It is generally accepted that people need to have a reasonable hours for working during the day. Some people believe that working five days a week for fewer hours is much more better than working three days for long hours; nevertheless, other people do not think so. However, it is challenging for us to prefer one to another because both of them have their advantages and disadvantages. As a matter of fact, there are numerous reasons why working five days during a week with regarding an apt hours is more attractive, and I would explore only a few primary ones here.
In the beginning, the first aspect to point is that working for a suitable time leads to increase people's productivity in their career due to the fact that they will not be tired during the work day. In fact, work hours should be defined according to some significant features of people includes not only power but also energy. For example, tow group of workers with different work hours such as 12 and 8 hours, are examined in other to find an apt hours that they have a maximum amount of productivity for working during a day. After that, some workers, who had worked more than 12 hours, have been lowest amount of yield. Hence, paying attention to time that people will work is critical.
Second, the most persuasive point is that two days in a week is enough for every people to spend their time with family. Also increasing this time to more days will has some disadvantages such as the lack of sufficient focus on work. To illustrate this point only needs refer to a company where their workers have to work for long time during the day, even if they had around four days as holiday. Given this issue, every week when they came back, they were not capable of concentrating on their work. Thus, if the number of free days during a week is extended to more than two days, it would lead to create some problems for people.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that people should have an appropriate work hour; therefore, the considerable factors in having a good work hour are not only enhancing people's output but also having adequate concentrate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and example to suppor 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is difficult for teacher to be both popular (like by student) and effective in helping student in learning 71
- tpo 44 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is difficult for teacher to be both popular (like by student) and effective in helping student in learning 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hour'?
Suggestion: hour
...d that people need to have a reasonable hours for working during the day. Some people...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ive days a week for fewer hours is much more better than working three days for long hours;...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hour'?
Suggestion: hour
...ays during a week with regarding an apt hours is more attractive, and I would explore...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hour'?
Suggestion: hour
...s, are examined in other to find an apt hours that they have a maximum amount of prod...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'been the lowest'.
Suggestion: been the lowest
...who had worked more than 12 hours, have been lowest amount of yield. Hence, paying attentio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...people to spend their time with family. Also increasing this time to more days will ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... increasing this time to more days will has some disadvantages such as the lack of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63020833333 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42137091528 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4540864506 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.533333333 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.45110844103 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383412225494 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154043364457 0.076458572812 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775239398934 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258469791857 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859703427019 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.