Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Which one is more important? Making new friends or keeping old friends? I agree with the latter. People keep chasing their goals, new life, higher salaries, and better job. It is hard to keep everything as the same. Friends can be changed as a person change. Also, living in different time zone and space can decrease the time we spending with old friends. It is better for people to make new friends to adopt different life they are experiencing.
With different environment we are living, our life can be vary from the old ones. Take an university student for example. His life experience can never be the same as his senior high life. His old friends in senior high can hardly share the same topics and interests as he has in the university. It is better for him to move on to a new friend zone in his university.
As we are getting old, we can be altered by our targets. It is difficult to always keep the same personality or hobby. Some people can share the same hobby for a few years but not for a long time. When I was 16, my friends and I liked to ride a bicycle on weekends and having fun together. However, the stress of enter into a good university forced me to give up on this hobby. My friends passed by as I went through their lives. Keeping old friends is less important than making new friends who share the same aims for me.
Different time zone and space can eliminate many relationships. Once people are separated, the relation between them can fade out for lesser time to share stories and hang out together. Instead of keeping old relationships, people should build up new connections with new people around their new lives.
It is more important to having new friends than keeping our old friends, for our personalities, hobbies, and lives can be changed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Mitra-T | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 75 | view |
- The cane toad is a large 1 8kg amphibian species native to Central and South America It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers crops by eating harmful insects Unfortunately the toad multiplied r 76
- The reading offers an idea that the world wood businesses are focusing on ecocertification label instead of the American wood industry The lecture holds different opinions on the contrary Albeit the reading claims that the American consumers do not trust 76
- 30 The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than 68
- It is no longer for a society to regard a man or a woman as a hero 50
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ife can be vary from the old ones. Take an university student for example. His lif...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51607999464 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496894409938 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8182764154 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.3333333333 100.406767564 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4166666667 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.45110844103 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2418861694 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892751317804 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978131844997 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165320739143 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761303247947 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 11.7677419355 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.63 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.