Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
With no doubt, people all around the world hold diifferent perspectives toward various topics. Some members of society think that they should gain thire awareness from the sources that have similar opinions with them, while others feel that it is imperative to know how the opposite sides think and act. As far as I'm concerned, it is more usefull to only watch and read the news sources related to our point of view, due to avoid extra stresses and have better concentration.
To begin with, presently, people get frustrated from the tedium of their daily livings. After their busy days, they may choose the news channel to watch on the TV or read newspapers to be free from any anxiety made by their obligations. If they decide to be aware of the other perspectives, and watch their opponent news channels, they would be full of stress and resentment. As an illustration, last month, my sister was laying on the caoch for rexaing, abruptly decided to watch FOX news, in that period of time, they were struggling with the presidential election's resule and all of their content was aginst democrat parties. Consequently, my sister that had voted for democrats, became angry and turned th TV off. She was anxious about the election result and could not be calm as well. This example demonstrates how it is harmful for our brain and health to watch the opposite news sources.
Moreover, it would be difficult for us to concentrate on the main points of our views if we have awareness of other contradictory opinions. As a result, if we should act, immidately, as an partisan for our parties, it would be delayed by getting distracted from main occurances. For example, last year, we had a crazy presidential election in our country, Iran. I was preoccupied by reading the newspapers that their thought was on the other side of min. Thanks to this ditraction, I missed on of the most important debates that was in our university. I sould have been there to defend my personal views and complaine about the infractions in the election. If I didn't read those newspapres, I would concentrate better on the best work to do for my candidate.
To recap, I firmly believe that people should avoid being to exposuer of other sides' news. It could be hurtful for our body by increasing the stress levels, and we cannot focuse app
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 86
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...opposite sides think and act. As far as Im concerned, it is more usefull to only w...
^^
Line 2, column 499, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ptly decided to watch FOX news, in that period of time, they were struggling with the presiden...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...esult, if we should act, immidately, as an partisan for our parties, it would be d...
^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...in. Thanks to this ditraction, I missed on of the most important debates that was ...
^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t the infractions in the election. If I didnt read those newspapres, I would concentr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, no doubt, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7841191067 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68792109282 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543424317618 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9528844582 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.473684211 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16245344947 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519227964818 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425976134365 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099379745482 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404449298078 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.