Thanks to the advent of information and communication technologies, a variety of news sources have created including the websites on the internet and social media. Since news plays a crucial role in the quality of our lives, it is so important to choose them wisely. Many people may prefer to receive information from certain sources with specific views; while others would rather listen and read from sources with different attitudes. I am unanimous with the latter group for two main reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
First of all, receiving information from different news sources will better reveal the fact, since they give us views on different aspects of an event. There are many groups or organizations in the world which intend to take advantages of events through media. For instance, the fact of many political stories is the slave to the biased policies of central governments. Thus, to better figure out the reality, one must put together all the news from either national or international media. Hence, being aware of this issue and know about various perspectives of events will help us to have a more accurate perception about what is really going on in the world around us.
Moreover, being exposed to various perspectives will undoubtedly expand one’s horizon; while reading or watching certain sources of news will for people bring about nothing but narrow sight. People can learn from different attitudes toward certain events, updating their thoughts to have a better life. My own experience was a complelling example of this. I grew up in a family with rigid religious beliefs, and I had been living many years with some principles which were on the contrary with each other in my mind. At that time, I started to read a variety of books in various areas. As a result, many of my complex challenges about the world and life solved, and now l live peacefully inside. Therefore it is very beneficial to hear and read from other people, especially who have beliefs that are very different from yours.
To make the long story short, I think that read and watch news from different sources can be more beneficial in a way that, they better help to reveal the fact of events and give more accurate perceptions of the world, and it helps people to expand their horizon and have a better
life.
- Which one do you prefer? Why?1) a company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or2) another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days. 90
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before? 73
- do you agree or disagree?people should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that are very different from what they do at work. 80
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important Which do you prefer and why 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 732, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lved; and now l live peacefully inside. Therefore it is very beneficial to hear and read ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o expand their horizon and have a better life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90773067332 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56997516688 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533665835411 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0429897513 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23634458996 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744818362633 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591744618362 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145985276974 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043516307473 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.