Nowadays, with the develpment of technology, more and more children have an access to digital products since a little age. Some people hold the opinion that children parents learn more from children than children do, for the reason that they lack the ability to keep up with the informative era. However, from my point of view, parents still have a strong ability to influence children and guide them to grow up well.
To begin with, parents are good teachers for children because of their experience and knowledge, which is formed through dozens of years’ studying and interaction among people. To be more specific, education, working experience and living skills can not be obtained only by one second. Equipped with all these stuff, parents are definately more experienced and knowledgable than their children who come to the world for only a few years. Just as an old saying goes, ‘ parents are the first teacher of children’. It is parents that teach the children how to dress themselves up, how to use chopsticks and how to spell their own names. It is parents that build up a harmonious family for children, which protect them from wind and rains. It is parents that help children to recognize different Chinese characters, various colors, multiple plants. Parents teache us a lot since we are unfamilar to the society, thus, we children benefit a lot from out parents.
Besides, although children are born among the technology equipments, parents also have the ability to manipulate all these electrical stuffs, which means that both the children and parents do well with these morden environment. Technology development don’t affect the learning ability of human beings. Not only can young peole keep up with the lattest technolohy, adults can also fit with the artificial intelligence. For example, my grandparent, a retired 90 years’ old teacher, get up early every to watch the lattest news in front of the television to learn what happend around. When we have breakfast together, he introduces all the fashion news to us, which we youngsters don’t know. Therefore, despite the older people may have difficulties catching up with the learning rate of youngsters, young people still can learn a lot from them.
In conclusion, I strongly hold the opinion that children learn more from their parents in the modern times.
- Imagine that a professor wants students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of time Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone Why 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern times parents learn more from their children than children learn from their parents 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern times parents learn more from their children than children learn from their parents 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...technology, more and more children have an access to digital products since a little age....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...which protect them from wind and rains. It is parents that help children to recogn...
^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t children learn more from their parents in the modern times.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09067357513 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6621651234 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536269430052 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2976019485 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.166666667 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451932090795 0.236089414692 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152822143426 0.076458572812 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113348261891 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340579621166 0.150856017488 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951348757067 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.