In today’s competitive world, leading has been counting a tedious and challenging job. A top-notch leader is one who makes the most profitable decision in various circumstances. A forerunner possesses a variety of qualities ranging from humility to honesty. Although it is opined by some that the more quickly a leader makes a decision, the more successful will be, this essay is trying to refute this notion. Throughout the following paragraphs, among the most predominant reasons in support of this contention heightening the accuracy and becoming aware of alternative solutions will be meticulously scrutinized to advocate this standpoint that if a chief is not fast in making the decision, he will not be seen as ineffective to the people who lead.
To commence with, in most cases there is a trade-off between speed-accuracy. An erudite boss should weigh the advantages and downsides of the matter from a different lens. It is obvious that faster decisions are more likely to encounter flaws, so a knowledgeable chief must precisely investigate the cons and pros of a viewpoint before making a result. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what has elaborated above. Here, I depict one of my own experiences. When I was working in the Harvard Lab., the dean asked me to offer advice to boost the internet’s infrastructure, because I was a computer whiz, on the spur of the moment I gave an opinion that not only needed much more time and cost but also there were diverse possible solutions with lower cost. Accordingly, in most of the hectic situations and academic cases, it takes time to reach the best choices.
Furthermore, time passing helps a leader to face with other alternative approaches and different windows of opportunities. Undoubtedly, the initial solution is not the best solution and the chief should hold meetings to be acquainted with other possible viewpoints. To more clarify the condition, I mention the outcome of one survey conducted at Harvard School to probe the impact of the time passing on students’ decisions. Over 85% of the participants believed that throughout the time they readily overcome their stresses and after scrutiny, they depict the best answer. Therefore, not only time passing helps to relieve the tension but also it supports us to meet other postulates that become tangible toward the end of the deadlines.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that it is true that being fast has been counted as an outstanding trait but there are more benefits for leaders to make decisions throughout time and also, there is a conflict between being fast and effective.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All school teachers should be required to attend courses every 5 years to update their knowledge
- 11 In times of an economic crisis in which area should governments reduce their spending 1 Arts2 Scientific research3 Parks and public gardens The Preference type three sides of the issue should be discussed but focusing on one 90
- Some people think that older children should be required to take care of the younger children Others think that this should be done by parents or other adults Which do you prefer 86
- Do you agree or disagree Some people believe that video games could inspire young students interest and make their study more efficient rather than distracting them and a waste of time so young students should be allowed to play video games 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decisions quickly when a leader takes too much time to make decisions he will be seen as inefficient to the people he leads 90
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in most cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05760368664 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97168302446 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555299539171 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3759734222 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.944444444 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287144707257 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703699271715 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614644625467 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159461065085 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741520646017 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in most cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05760368664 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97168302446 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555299539171 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3759734222 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.944444444 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287144707257 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703699271715 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614644625467 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159461065085 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741520646017 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.