Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
Some people especially elder ones argue that the attitude, work culture developed in today’s world will impact negatively on our posterity. They cite violence, negligence, disrespect for elders and many more to support their view. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that our current style will lead to revolutionary development and ease life of our future generations. I will support my viewpoint with two reasons.
First of all, present generation is well advanced because female contribute to work equally as males, be it manual or intellectual task. For example, our past could never imagine a girl getting into military profession. Today, a record has shown that women make nearly seventy percent of Intelligence Bureau, outnumbering men. Unlike old days where women took care of family and house, they can now be seen taking care of entire nation. It is evident that if more minds work on a problem, country would develop exponentially. This would make young girls realise their power of strength, inculcate confidence within them that they are equally gifted, leading them to mull upon emerging crisis instead of locking themselves within four walls.
Secondly, there are many areas to be explored. People in todays’ world are working on prospective topics, this would form a basis for posterity to focus and work upon. Let’s take a general example, professors are doing a great job by teaching their students, they develop a thirst to find solution to any prevailing issue. Students gain interest, pursue future studies in the field and work up on it. The technologies and software made today can be a key to open the lock for brighter future.
Finally, advanced inventions that have been made in the past decade have guided us in the right path to reach zenith. A layman might argue that there are negative impacts of these such as pollution, disrespect for elders. But efforts have been taken to look into these issues such as introduction of greener technologies, improve treatment methods to cure illness ,pain and diseases- providing more life to older people.
To conclude, the issue of whether our current way of life have a negative impact on future generation in complex. Some have suggested that their inventions in nuclear energy have led people to lose their lives, on hearing certain instances of war and disasters. Nevertheless, I still contend that current mind will be beneficial for posterity.
- Color photography has eliminated the need for realism in artistic painting in the opinion of a number of art scholars and artists At the same time many members of the art community still feel that realistic artwork is still valuable and worthwhile 54
- Students should fund their education with part-time work that they do while they study. 83
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 60
- Opportunities do not come to people by luck Instead the most successful people are the ones that are constantly seeking out opportunities 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...anced because female contribute to work equally as males, be it manual or intellectual tas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mprove treatment methods to cure illness ,pain and diseases- providing more life t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, as to, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19298245614 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71368743074 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616541353383 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9192143092 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234503347061 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651590576088 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992515672569 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137306848268 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113311885287 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.