Honestly, if asked, I would be in full agreement with the claim that our current lifestyle will have an impact on future generations. For two reasons, I feel this way, which I will continue to explore in this article.
First of all, there is a lot of deforestation around the world because people need more land to expand the human race, and they need wood to build homes and furniture. Because trees help to clean the air by collecting carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen, this decline in trees often contributes to environmental problems. As oxygen is necessary for human and animal survival, people face a lot of breathing problems with a reduction in oxygen in the air. Fresh babies are born with asthma-like conditions that have never been known before. This is a convincing illustration of my own experience. Two years ago, I began looking for a place to build a new house when I was preparing to grow my family. The spot I finally settled on was full of trees and to create our new house they have to be cut. Eventually, for building my home furniture, I used those tresses, but those trees were still gone. It clearly states that if I hadn't wanted to extend my family, those trees would still have been there and would have provided other people in that area with fresh oxygen free air.
Second, that industrialization in the form of water and air pollution has further devoted itself to causing further contamination of the atmosphere. With these human activities, wastes generated by these factories are directed either into the air in form of smoke or they are released in water bodies. This release of waste to water is further hampering the water animals like fish which are used by humans as their food in many countries. The story of my neighbor is a powerful example of this. He had been blessed with a baby boy a year ago. They noticed after a couple of months that baby used to cough a lot when they used to visit the market to get some household items. In this regard, they are swift to consult a doctor and shocked to know that their baby has a bronchitis problem that was triggered when he was still in the womb of his mother because of them living close to industrial area while she was pregnant. This clearly depicts that the son of my neighbor would not have faced this problem early in his life if our climate had been better.
In summary, I conclude that the future generations will be negatively affected by our lifestyle. This is because population growth leads to tree cutting and the massive industrialization that is taking place these days.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Measures to control spread of cane toad in Australia. 81
- Comics being an art form unique to America 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements makes product seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 925, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...still gone. It clearly states that if I hadnt wanted to extend my family, those trees...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, honestly, if, look, second, so, still, while, i feel, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64989059081 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58985766708 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516411378556 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5981162836 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.19047619 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7619047619 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14188907566 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464413225187 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748012220001 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124182334455 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905286163247 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.