Parents' involvement in children's education, with no doubt has direct impacts on kids’ personal development and academic performance. Whether parents’ time consumed on children's education has been increased or decreased has sparked a sharp debate. As far as I am concerned, parents have low participant in the offspring’s education
First of all, the Internet has become increasingly important in children’s life, which gradually replaces the role of parents in their kids’ education to some extent. The rapid development of cutting-edge technologies makes it possible for kids to have access to great mass of information. Currently, the popularity of digital classroom and other means of digital teaching tools is widely applied to assist them in fully absorbing knowledge and expanding their outlook. As a sequence, great chances are that children incline to get their questions answered online rather than looking for help from their parents. Thus, due to the interference of technologies, parents’ involvement in kids is relatively declined.
Secondly, the economic pressure is also an essential reason for the lowly educational involvement of parents. Since the high cost of living in big cities, parents dedicate colossal amounts of time to endless assignments in exchange for high wages, almost having no time to bond with their family members. It’s worth noting that the parents coming from rural background have been forced to leave their hometowns to search for employment opportunities in big cities. Therefore, they have severely limited chances, virtually twice per year, to stay with their children, which means that it's hardly presumably that they can be involved in their children's education.
What's more, the threshold of education has been increased into a higher level of which the parents are incapable of participating in their children's education. Indeed, with time going by, the new products emerge in rapid succession. Old generations’ stock of knowledge is not enough to deal with their children’s complex questions, which makes parents objectively separated from their kids' education.
Based on the arguments provided above, the compelling justifications-the Internet, the economic pressure and low level of education of parents have demonstrated the point that parents' participation of the offspring’s education is at low level
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...volved in their childrens education. Whats more, the threshold of education has be...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fspring's education is at low level
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75418994413 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26168484974 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5651044797 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308405754017 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113860944943 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595229729681 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191514662124 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038287863979 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.