Without a shadow of a doubt, parents play an important role in cultivating children. A glance at people's attitude towards the time of parents that allocated to children's education brings to a light question that has been asked several times, namely, whether contemporary parents are more involved in their children's education or parents in the past dedicate more. Were I forced to choose, I would prefer the former point of view to the later one and I will elaborate on what rationale my perspective is based on in the following paragraphs.
The first reason worth mentioning is that the fierce competition in modern society forces parents to be involved more in children's education. According to the serious inflation and high unemployment rate, available jobs for the young generation is decreasing year by year, which means they need for people who own competitiveness is much more popular than before. In this situation, parents have to dedicate not only their time but also their money to cultivating their children so as to help them acquire more knowledge and skills to gain a competitive advantage and get a better job.
In addition to that, another essential reason is the educational perspective is changed gradually. In the past decades, school education is regarded as the most significant factor in children's education, however, along with more psychological research goes, scientists have found that parents do play an important role than expected in developing their children. To illustrate more, parents have more opportunities to shape their children's personalities, even choices in their future. This phenomenon of perspective change contributes to helping parents dedicate more time to teaching and accompanying their children.
A voice arises that compared to parents in the past, contemporary parents are busier so they participate in children's growth less. However, this claim must be scrutinized meticulously. In fact, with the development of management, parents today actually have a more flexible working schedule, which enables them to be involved more in education. For example, in some countries or regions, companies allow their employees to randomly choose 5 days from a week to work, which means they can properly allocate their time according to their children's schedule. Besides, governments are taking more serious supervise on the execution of 40 hours regulation and engaging in reducing workloads to parents in need. In the contrast, parents who lived in the past were troubled in the poor economic condition and forced to take some part-time jobs to feed on their children. In that case, they actually had less time to spend with their kids.
In conclusion, drawing upon the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly hold the view that parents today are more involved in their children's education. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people's eyes, I firmly believe my opponents will yield after being shown to my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 479, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...eir money to cultivating their children so as to help them acquire more knowledge and sk...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ional perspective is changed gradually. In the past decades, school education is r...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ad less time to spend with their kids. In conclusion, drawing upon the reasons I ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2507.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27789473684 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88941060232 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530526315789 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.908147606 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.947368421 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376034676067 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1272137396 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810027178296 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228851044373 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617259428171 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.