Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When people are in trouble, they usually tend to ask others for help, especially the young people. In the past, advice from parents seemed to be reliable and helpful. But young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives nowadays.
At the first place, with the development of modern technology, young people have easier access to worldwide information. In the past, the ways to obtain knowledge are limited, such as newspaper, television, and radio, etc. And people can only accept what are provided by those media. It is hard for them to search things they want to know. Currently, the internet allows people to get information wherever they are and whatever they want to desire by just clicking the mouse or taping on the phone. The whole process takes only several seconds or minutes.
On top of that, young people now are more likely to turn to their peers when making decisions. As they are at similar age and have similar interest, it is easier for them to communicate with each other. Social media also facilitate the interaction among the youth.
In summary, instead of depending on their parents, young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 86 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | subashdevkota | 85 | view |
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 90
- The article and the lecture both deal with electronic medical records Whilst the author claims that electronic databases are better than paper based for three reasons the lecturer contradicts his arguments respectively First according to the reading elect 60
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, in summary, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 1977.66487455 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 204.0 407.700716846 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92156862745 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.48103885553 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40402072533 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 212.727598566 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 618.680645161 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9008222562 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2307692308 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393382656653 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132683472594 0.076458572812 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166073830523 0.0737576698707 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281709505476 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146679037519 0.0645574589148 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.