In today's hectic life workforce tries to adapt its skills as more aligned as it can to what companies absorb. Developing a skill plays almost the paramount issue in everyone's lifetime. Controversy exists whether having multi-skills results in more success or only one skill. The author marks out this idea that gaining multi-skills brings more competency for the workforce.
Firstly, People who have been trained for several skills show more competency in workplaces, as past experiences demarcate. Generally, employers would rather absorb ambidextrous workers in order to shrink costs. In this way, those who developed more skills potentially have more chances to be employed or to save their positions. Thus, having different professions can benefit both the company and individuals overall.
Secondly, business with unprecedented ups and downs in every circumstance can be risky even for valuable companies. As we have seen in before, Wars, natural occurrences, pandemics, and even economical fluctuations can endanger one's job. In this situation workers who have shown the most flexibility can servive and the rest may ruin. Depending on one skill may have its threat inherently that the business becomes closed by numerous changes in lifestyles as having been more quickly than before by instigating of technology. For instance, a very needy job in the past like typist today is dying out by the emergence of artificial intelligence and new tools. Hence, people who depend on one role put themselves at more risks in front of economical changes as its been proven clearly in the past.
Moreover, the new era of creativity has almost dominated all businesses. As creativity becomes the hearts of major giant companies they require human forces with the highest level of creativity, and creativity inherently needs multi-skills to be combined. In this way also people with multi abilities would do better than one skill.
To sum up, the author absolutely supports the idea of having remarked competency of multi-skilled people. While they can tolerate more in front of economical challenges and disruptions, they have more competency to grasp recruitments and also arguably they can develop more creativity.
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 40
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor
- TOEFL integrated writing Dutch painter Rembrandt 70
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... show more competency in workplaces, as past experiences demarcate. Generally, employers would r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...en economical fluctuations can endanger ones job. In this situation workers who have...
^^^^
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ut themselves at more risks in front of economical changes as its been proven clearly in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4121037464 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91867246162 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590778097983 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8368576109 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8421052632 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298705997615 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957000161414 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072309998508 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170720437998 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469628497411 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.