Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
Updating oneself with information is really vital in today's world, considering a plethora of things are going on such as innovation of technology, explosion in other countries, voting for president, and many other things. In my opinion, gaining this information by watching electronic devices is really beneficial. This is due to several compelling reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent essay.
To begin with, it is essential to stay informed and keep abreast with all the newest developments around the world by watching and reading the news on electronic devices rather than reading paper materials. For example, a decade ago, my grandfather used to read newspaper every morning, sitting on his favorite chair with a cup of tea. It was not easy for him to read newspaper since fonts were too small for him to read and those flipping pages noise were too annoying. He often had to use his big pair of glasses to read it. At that time, we did not have any electronic device. After ten years, I bought him an iPad, which made his life easier. He can now easily make fonts large, which he could not do on paper materials and can swipe without making any sound, unlike in newspaper. Consequently, he prefers to read news on electronic device.
Furthermore, electronic devices are too small and people can take it with them anywhere anytime and it just fit right in your pocket. Individuals can have access to thousands of resources by just searching on Google. For instance, last year in college, my little brother got a science project. He decided to go to library and searched for myriad articles and research papers related to his project, which was very time consuming. Subsequently, he decided to do research on his computer with the help of internet access. Therefore, he was able to complete his project before time only because of useful materials on the internet and he would take computer with him anywhere he would go.
In a nutshell, I strongly believe that watching electronic devices can really be helpful than using paper materials. This is because one can avoid annoying noise and small fonts from reading materials and also these devices are handy and time consuming in terms of searching anything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Huge Jackman | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | Mithun Chandra Banik | 66 | view |
- TPO 41 Coal ash 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Ways to predict earthquakes 80
- TPO 33 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 70
- TPO 25 Vessels used as electric batteries in the past 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, really, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92042440318 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65491933915 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559681697613 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1754066521 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6315789474 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252365753159 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796884114945 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824197852714 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158932832181 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509390122506 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.