Without a shadow of a doubt, constraints play a pivotal role in organizing a society in a myriad of facets and controlling its citizens’ behavior. A glance at people's attitude towards these rules brings a light question that has been asked several times, namely, are the rules that society today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict? Were I forced to judge, I would be in favor of the opinion that the rules are not strict and I will elaborate on what rationale my perspective is based on in the following paragraphs.
The first reason worth mentioning is that there is an urge for drugs and alcohol these days among young people, who are forbidden to use them. In other words, drinking alcohol and using drugs are not allowed, and using them has adverse implications such as going to jail. However, statics show that adolescents account for a great portion of alcohol and drug addict people. On the other hand, it is obvious that teenagers are afraid of going to jail or offending rules unless no one cares about their behaviors, which makes them feel free and independent to do whatever they want. My friend’s experience is an excellent example of this. Back in high school, one of my friends got addicted to cigarettes and used to bring them to school, which was against the rules. Nevertheless, no one took extreme action in order to stop her, and she continued smoking in the school. This example can epitomize the same society’s problems as well.
Moreover, another prominent reason is that social rules can exert a positive influence on the social atmosphere. For example, young people are asked to respect the elders and help people in need. They can also receive applaud in gratitude from people they have helped and gain a sense of achievement from helping others. It is crystal clear a mutually beneficial way that leads to a warm and friendly social atmosphere. A warm social atmosphere can ever decrease the criminal rate into another magnitude according to there are fewer and fewer people want to deprive others for personal profits. Had it not been for applying these rules, a warm and friendly social atmosphere could not be generated easily.
A voice arises that some rules are hard to follow and obey because they restrict people from multiple aspects, while this claim needs to be scrutinized meticulously. The difficulties of following these rules originate from the lack of a completed and kind value system. With the governments attaching more importance in inculcating young people to generate a correct value system, it will be no longer hurdles lies on the road of obeying these roads. This investment in developing people's awareness of following rules is beneficial for forming a virtuous cycle of the social atmosphere.
In conclusion, drawing upon the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly hold that these rules are not hard to obey and follow. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people's eyes, I firmly believe my opponents will yield after being shown to my article.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 90
- TPO 44 Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 90
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it 1 touring historic sites 2 going to markets or shops 3 eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes 70
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9359223301 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6173244749 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6114875167 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.52173913 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3913043478 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258517361694 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678290325868 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893008334273 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154682109449 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114606752777 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9359223301 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6173244749 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6114875167 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.52173913 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3913043478 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258517361694 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678290325868 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893008334273 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154682109449 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114606752777 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.