Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
There is no doubt that media have a crucial role in all societies. Due to its paramount importance, efforts for elevating their effectiveness have been always broadcasting's top priorities. No one can deny the direct and indirect effects of news on our lives. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether today's media are less concern about the accuracy of news or not. Some people hold the view that the today's news are less correct and have a bad effect on society. Some others take an opposite viewpoint and believe the broadcasting are more careful from past. I, despite the general consensus, contend that first viewpoint carries more weight. In what follows, I am going to aptly delve into my perspective.
First of all one should take into account the fact that nowadays there are more media than past. One of the most important key of medium that can publish a good and excellent news depends on their employer. How many people are so professional in the world? So most of them have a few experiment and cannot understand between the fake and truth news. Take a personal experience as an example, I listened to may national radio last month and the lecturer told about my company that the news was fake story which had been made by our rival. When I called to that broadcasting, their chief apologized me and said their speaker was very young and did not know our company.
The second reason that I would like to bring about this topic is that nowadays media have a business role in the world. Their owner try to catch more money although spread fake news. They believe a lot of information exist in the world and they can make fake news. For their news take a little percentage of all information and cannot be problem for public. But they do not consider this matter that most of media copy their news from others and one fake story can produce in the world only in one hour. The result from of recent study in my country indicate that 78 percent of media have an owner corporation that they invest their money in this field. So they can reach a lot of money in any way.
The last but not least reason by which the claim is justified is that there are not a watching organization on today's media. The internet is the most popular media between people especially young people. There are a lot of web and social media that produce news and change the news according to their habit. So it is very difficult to find which news is true or fake. People have a hectic life and want to read news only and trust the broadcasting. It can annoy the society and has a bad advantages for mankind. Psychologist have conducted many studies in this field and they find that fake news can destroy the cells on the brain in few time. Because person think it is true and after while he found it is fake and the brain must delete it. It can harmful for brain and have bad advantages for mental of people.
From what have been discussed above, we may safely reach the conclusion that nowadays media are not concern about their news and their bad effect in the societies. There are a lot of reason such as money, less experience employer, no supervisor and so on. Consequently, it is highly recommended that the government establish one organization that manage the news across the country and protect from fake news. Also there are many reason for this issue that I cannot describe them in this article because of short time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...not. Some people hold the view that the todays news are less correct and have a bad ef...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 613, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
... more careful from past. I, despite the general consensus, contend that first viewpoint carries m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experiment seems to be countable; consider using: 'few experiments'.
Suggestion: few experiments
...al in the world? So most of them have a few experiment and cannot understand between the fake ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 401, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the media') or simply say ''most media''.
Suggestion: most of the media; most media
...t they do not consider this matter that most of media copy their news from others and one fak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 14, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...ot of money in any way. The last but not least reason by which the claim is justified ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 215, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun web seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of webs'.
Suggestion: a lot of webs
...ople especially young people. There are a lot of web and social media that produce news and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 411, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...the country and protect from fake news. Also there are many reason for this issue th...
^^^^
Line 10, column 426, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
... protect from fake news. Also there are many reason for this issue that I cannot describe t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, while, no doubt, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2844.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 620.0 407.700716846 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58709677419 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98996985923 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40065027611 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443548387097 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 888.3 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6003584229 165% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4908593277 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6470588235 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184646305049 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495788897505 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429834263363 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11341218245 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120633375017 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.