Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
While some agree that it is more important for the government to spend money on the education of young children than to spend money on universities, I believe funding universities should be prioritized for the following reasons that will be further explored in the following essay.
Firstly, various fields of education change rapidly and become more advanced throughout time. The government should direct its funds to cope with the fast pace of advanced technological evolution. For example, the field of dentistry has changed a lot since I graduated. In other words, many of the techniques and devices are no longer used now. They are replaced with more technologically sophisticated devices and techniques. Thus, it should be mandatory for the universities to own these modern technologies and devices, so the students would train and practice clinically using these devices. This could happen if the government focuses on funding the universities. Eventually, students will get the best education which is inevitable in nowadays competitive work fields.
In addition, funding universities is more useful and harvest faster results than funding young school grades. Therefore, it will benefit both the government and the undergraduates. In other words, the government will get a good reputation for providing good education and cultivating advanced talents in five years after the graduation of these students. Obviously, it is more beneficial for a government that wants to prove its qualifications to the public in a short time. For instance, a student graduate in five years will provide the public a live example of the successful plan implemented by the government. If the government funds young school grades, they won’t see the result before twenty years. Thus, funding universities is the best plan the government should adopt.
To sum up, it is important for the government to fund universities because the pace of the world is so fast and educational programs need to be updated with the required tools. Also, a successful graduate student able to compete in international work fields is a walking proof of the success of the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 738, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
... the best education which is inevitable in nowadays competitive work fields. In addition,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3284457478 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07018656235 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507331378299 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6172998824 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.944444444 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331178463358 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906499456146 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889060388855 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226035311783 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118563547881 0.0645574589148 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.