Nowadays, the education process around the globe has changed noticeably. The interactive lessons and many other class activities have reshaped the teacher's rule in the classroom. Some people believe that the most important criterion in teaching is the relationship between students and teachers. However, I believe that knowledge and experience are the most crucial in the teaching process. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, a teacher with an excellent knowledge is more capable of explaining the concepts and the course in general. A better understanding of a specific subject makes an individual the best teacher. Moreover, a teacher who knows every detail of a specific subject can elaborate on it most easily. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. I took a fluid mechanics course in my third in the university. Fluid mechanics is considered one of the toughest courses in the engineering field. However, my professor was specialized in fluid mechanics, and he used to teach this course for about twenty years. Consequently, I did not face any problem, and actually, this course was one of the easiest subjects in the university. All in all, a lecturer with excellent knowledge and experience makes courses seem easier.
Furthermore, a teacher with perfect knowledge always encourages students to think creatively. Creative thinking always comes after a better understanding of the subject. According to psychology, artistic thinking usually comes after a comprehensive understanding of the subject. For instance, during the fluid mechanic classes, the professor encouraged us to think about the physical meanings of Navier stokes law and other mechanic equations. He encouraged us to think outside the box and away from mathematical meanings. This way of teaching gave us a better understanding and taught us a lot of details.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that teacher with experience and knowledge is better than a teacher who can relate well with students. This is because acquiring new knowledge seems easier when the lecturer is excellent, and the educators with better knowledge always stimulate critical thinking in a classroom.
- A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus 83
- In 1939 David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell s Pulitzer Prize winning novel Gone with the Wind The movie proved to be among the most important in the history of world cinema To this day in fact it remains the American box office champion 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Competition between friends usually negatively impacts friendships 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs. Use specific reasons and examples to sup 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, third, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39714285714 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06144557025 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3479060033 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8636363636 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240590453833 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672628768952 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875991126263 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145597579974 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751887384551 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.