Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

There are different opinion on whether the teachers should talk about their social or political stance in their classes or not. Despite some people thinks that stating these issued by teachers is neither necessary nor decent, I believe othervise, maintaing that it is vital that teachers talk about these stuff to their students since it is crucial for their education process and also widens their minds. In what follows, I will delve into these reasons to subtantiate my perspective.

Without a doubt, the most consequential reason regarding to mentioning social and political issues and personal views by teachers is its positive impact on the students' education. In schools, overally, there two kinds of courses. The first category of courses are those incroporates proven principles and equations, such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, and so on. Government can not manipulate the content of these courses since they contain genuine equations and stuff having been proved by scientists. On the other hand, in the second, which includes those courses about socialogy, politician, and so on, the government can easily interfere and change their countents in its favor. Hence, if teachers did not teach extra stuff to their students and they did not talk about their views on political or social matters, their students would never learn about the real and intact aspects of these subjects. Therefore, this reason clearly manifests that teachers should talk about their social or political views to educate their students much better.

Although the aforemnetioned reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, there is another remarkable point deserving some words here which concerns with helping students to acquire wider viewpoints on political or social issues. In many schools, different teachers teach different courses and they see problems through their own viewpoints which is based on their background. For example, a mathematic teacher view on a social or political problem is very different from a sociology teacher on the same problem. If teachers talk about their personal opinions about political or social issued, which are everyday topics, the students will benefit from getting acquintined with various aspects of a same problem. Consequently, when the face such problems in the future, they are able to think out of box and cope with those problems more effectively. Thus, this point inllustrates the fact that if teachers talk about their personal opinions on social and political stuff, they assist their students to think better and more effective.

All in all, many people are in favor of the fact the teachers should not be allowed to talk about their personal perspective on political or social stuff in their classes; nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to the conclusion that this subject is not only beneficial, but is it is also integral part of education. This is because it is both helpful for the students' educational proces, and help them to think out of box when they counter political or social problems in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... teachers is its positive impact on the students education. In schools, overally, there ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, of course, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25303643725 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65916481891 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46963562753 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.9118074835 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.166666667 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254950567279 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994985691881 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746396497401 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180411282372 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243985041423 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.