It is undeniable that teachers should try their best to impart academic knowledge to their students. However, when it comes to politics, some people claim teachers should not express their views in the classroom, but the others regard it as dispensible part of education. From my perspective, teachers should make their social or political views public to students.
Firstly, everyone has a right to express his attitude toward social and political problems, and teachers have no exception. History is filled with countless examples that teachers expressed their political opinions and had a profound influence on society. Confucius, one of the most celebrated educators in ancient China, had a massive concern about politics. Not only did he give political views to his students, but also teach them to devote themselves to politics to use their wisdom to serve their counties better. Nu xun, one of the greatest writers and also a professor in the university in the 20 century China, published numerous political articles on magazine and newspapers. His articles had a significant impact on the political revolution in the history of China.
Second, by expressing their social or political perspectives, teachers can help students develop a way of critical thinking, which is an essential characteristic for eligible intellectuals. Students may disagree with the stances of their teachers, and they can have debates together. Truth always becomes more apparent after a debate. In this way, students can know more about right from wrong and become more concern about the issues of their society and contribute efforts to reform it. Many great social revolutions were mainly or initially led by students, such as the February Revolution in Franch, and the May 4th Revolution in China.
Admmitly, when teachers explain and discuss their political attitudes in the classroom, it may take up some of the time the students originally can use for their academic study. However, when compared to its advantages, this concern becomes nothing. Education not only means imparting academic but also cultivating students to become responsible citizens. In this regard, political teaching plays a pivotal role in students' beliefs formation.
To sum up, I strongly assert that the advantages of explaining political issues by teachers in classrooms can outweigh its mentioned disadvantage since it can improve students critical thinking and discussion skills, also make them become responsible citizens.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- TPO 24 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...itudes in the classroom, it may take up some of the time the students originally can use fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal role in students beliefs formation. To sum up, I strongly assert that the ad...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4677002584 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86503070445 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537467700258 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0047202204 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.368421053 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262178509809 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868289314175 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688719636743 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153618111875 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554190821987 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.