There is no doubt that televisions play a crucial role on our life. We cannot ignore televisions role on social life. Some people considered that televisions damage their relationship and friendship. In my opinion, this notion of television’s destruction on social life is unquestionably true and it is a addiction. I will explore my reasons in my essay below.
First of all, before televisions did not come to our home, people used to chat more than today and spend their time for their family and friends. Today, when we come home from work, we just spend our rest of the day after the work on front of the TV. I want to give an example about my retired mother who spend 4 hours a day on front of the TV. When I and my sister want to communicate with her, she always ignores us or does not interest with our problems as a mother and these problems impede our social life. What’s more, there a lots of attractive Tv series such as, friends, narcos and more etc. People are dying for watching them and neglect their friends when their friends want to meet up. Thus, people rarely assemble because of the Tv series.
Second of all, some of the people tell us that there are lots of good the TV programmes which give them profound knowledge and people can talk about them. In opinion, even though there are lots of significant programmes, we squander our time with numerous idle programmes. For instance, in Turkey, marriage programs are so widespread today and people waste their time for considering and discussing which couples should marry on the programme. So I think if they watch national geography or other scientific channel, they can boost their technical knowledge and it can be more beneficial.
To sum up, the Tv is a tool for us to broaden our horizon if it uses for benefits. However, I belive that people can be more social when they turn off their televisions. Humankind should fight for all type of addictions even the TV.
- Some people prefer to live in small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 37
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 80
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Do you agree or disagree? 66
- Integrated essay. ETS OFFICIAL TOEFL iBT TEST-4 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...l life is unquestionably true and it is a addiction. I will explore my reasons in...
^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...ur social life. What's more, there a lots of attractive Tv series such as, friend...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...neglect their friends when their friends want to meet up. Thus, people rarely ass...
^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...use of the Tv series. Second of all, some of the people tell us that there are lots of g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, for instance, i think, no doubt, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68115942029 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63501059265 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5054588352 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1578947368 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0808591664452 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281354787889 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259138656841 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501856817424 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308132945102 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.