Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Two people can still become good friends if one of them has more money than the other one does

When children get admission in the school and as soon as they understand the meaning of friendship, they would tend to make friends starting from their nursery schools till their education ends. Friendship plays a very crucial role in everyone’s life. In this regard, some people think that money could be a factor when people make friends, while others hold a different opinion than friends do not need to have financially equivalent to maintain their strong bond. From my perspective, the former view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that money is an indispensable factor in friendship. To be more specific, I would say money is just an external factor that cannot be an obstruction for anyone to make their friends. There are many other critical issues that play an important role to obtain a good relationship. People can be good friends if they are supportive and understanding of each other, despite the fact that one of them is not rich enough. My opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own example. When I was a sophomore at university, I met one girl in biology class. She was the daughter of very well-known businessmen in my city, and I was from a middle-class family. However, we felt that we shared a common thought process, and also, our nature was also very much similar. Our bond was so well-built that she decided to take her further education abroad with me since I got a scholarship and shifted abroad to pursue my master’s. Accordingly, any of us never felt that her higher economic and social status has ever bothered our relationship.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is that having rich friends could be beneficial to acquire a strong bond between friends. To shed light on it, if look it from a positive viewpoint, people realize that supporting their friends financially in difficult time would a life-saver moment for them, and It is a real meaning of having a good friendship. To elaborate this more, last year we lost our house in an earthquake. It was the toughest time for my family since we did not have enough money to buy another house at the same time. At that time, not only my best friend’s dad helped my parents financially to buy a new house, but she allowed my whole family to live at her place until we have bought a new home. Thus, because of her politeness and helpful nature, our bond became, even more, stronger than earlier. Hence, had I not met a friend like her who was financially well-stabled, my parents would not have bought a house.
All in all, after contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that money cannot be a deciding factor for a good friendship. This is because people do not look for financial stability before making friends and because sometimes, having a rich friend would be advantageous when the other one is facing a financial crisis.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1089, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tus has ever bothered our relationship. Another equally noteworthy reason to bea...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76171875 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72860999412 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8191105568 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.583333333 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175406266605 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507277407767 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597271115715 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11835701503 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240157720668 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.