In the past decade, with the development of technology and science, schools have started approaching education in different ways. Now, students have an option for online education in order to complete their degree. In this regard, students may have to work on different group assignments. Some People think that working on a group project in person would be beneficial, while others hold a different opinion that it is better to work through e-mail for that. From my perspective, the former opinion carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that working in person helps students to communicate well. To be more specific, a group project has many phases such as making an outline plan, needs many corrections while working on it, and finally, an outcome of a project. Here, while talking face to face, it becomes easier for everyone to take a new approach for the project where individuals can present their creative opinions in the presence of everyone and make immediate improvements. On the contrary, working through e-mail, students may have to wait for everyone’s response for each step of a project, and because of that people may not show a constant involvement in the task.
Another noteworthy point is that communication in person would make a better project because working with everyone for the same tasks creates a pleasant environment that nudges students to raise their creative ideas and opinions. Moreover, it conveys the same spirit and excitement among all the students where people become more enthusiastic and can work for a better outcome. To shed more light on this, during the time of COVID-19, we were assigned in different groups for an online project while working from home. Meanwhile, a lack of being able to work in person created disorientation among group members, and employees started feeling isolated in a group that leads them to be reluctant to discuss projects. Thus, this disharmony among employees mitigates everyone’s willingness to produce a better work approach.
Lastly, having discussed the issue from this point of view, I rather look at it from another standpoint. Admittedly, there are evident benefits when students work in presence for a group task. However, sometimes it is better to work through email especially during this pandemic condition when people are safe inside their home and better able to work online instead of going to the workplace. People need to consider safety as a primary concern during this horrifying situation of COVID-19. Hence, when people are safe and healthy, they can work effectively and efficiently.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that making a group task in person would be a better option. This is because it helps people to connect with each other for a particular task and motivates them to be better able to work for a task.
- TPO 21 Integrated TOEFL essay 80
- TPO 54 LECTUREThe Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being 90
- TPO 43 integrated writing 70
- TPO 39 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Your friend wants to eat healthy which of the following three suggestions is better Be more disciplined and have a stronger will Work with people who share the same goals Consult a professional expert 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2452.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08713692946 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71688874976 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477178423237 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9223197098 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.454545455 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258948753922 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830509360226 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555572397358 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157153925497 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323865491929 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.