Most people agree that schools should try their best to maximize their efficiency. Nonetheless, there has been no shortage of debates among individuals on whether kids' learning is more efficient when they work in groups or alone on their projects and assignments. I vehemently cling to the notion that working together is more beneficial. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two of my most prominent reasons for advocating this viewpoint.
First and foremost, having been provided with the opportunity to exchange ideas in a lively atmosphere of free discussions, students will be equipped with the ability of interpretation, which in turn, opens the door to countless providential and permanent chances to reap benefits from. In other words, working as a group inspires students' creativity, intelligence, and imagination, which in the long run can guarantee a prosperous future for them. By exchanging ideas, they gain a profound comprehension of the subject. On the other hand, by working alone, they are constricted to their thoughts and can't go beyond a certain point. Working in a group widens their horizon and reduces their limitations. In a group, students also criticize each other's thoughts and by doing this they learn how to think critically, which can be very helpful in their life. A lot of problems in this hectic modern era can be solved if people learn how to think critically.
Furthermore, another equally compelling reason for corroborating my stance lies in the fact that by working in a team, children enhance their social skills, which is one of the most crucial abilities that every person needs in their life. In contemporary society, due to the growing self-centeredness of social mentality, having a notable social skill is the highest priority. There are flaws in the social ability of the contemporary human. Therefore, by working in a group in the school, this problem can be solved. Additionally, by socializing with other students, they strengthen their friendship and create a robust bond with each other. A lot of students feel reluctant about their school, but by having a better relationship with their classmates, they become more eager and enthusiastic about their school.
To put it all in a nutshell, having all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I strongly believe that if students work in groups, they learn much more efficiently, on the ground that they learn about different aspects of the subject, as well as they augment their social skills and make the school environment more friendly and delightful.
- TPO 64 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use 76
- TPO 50 Independent Writing Task all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 80
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 70
- Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before Why Use specific reasons and e 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y are constricted to their thoughts and cant go beyond a certain point. Working in a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20623501199 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99594774503 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541966426859 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.6482244547 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.611111111 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245525281501 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756991717789 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609759556174 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161011880277 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413132777677 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.