Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays don t give enough time to helping their communities

There has been a serious debate among the different generation about their efficiency for their society. When it comes the issue of allocating time to their community, older generations believe that they spent more time to help their community than what young people do nowadays. They think that young people should help their society more than this. From my point of view, they are wrong and there are lots of evidence which can confirm that claim.
Above all, the rate of scientific development is really higher nowadays than it was in the past. To be more exact, nowadays young people spend a lot of time to improve our knowledge about how we can make our life easier which will lead to an easier life for communities. For instance, young people invite the smartphone, which is really helpful for people. They can do a number of works with it. They can supply their staple by means of these phones and they should no longer go out for that goal. As a result, it is completely helpful for society.
The second reason why I feel that way is about the development in the facilities of the communities. Due to the growth of the population, we need more and more facilities such as more road, more public transportation's means and so on. Take my city, for example. It had only seven hundred thousand people forty years ago, while its population is two millions nowadays which need more facilities. We can see that there are better road condition and more means of public transportation these days, which demonstrate that young people are given enough time to help their societies.
The last reason which deserves some words is about the development in the culture of our communities. To clarify this point, more books are published nowadays than they were in the past. Furthermore, peoples' behavior in better way to each other and to their societies. All these things show that young people are helping their communities. My city is a compelling example of that. My father usually talks about lots of garbage which was in the city before the beginning of the new year since all people just wanted to clean their houses while there are no garbage in the city nowadays.
In conclusion, given the facts that the rate of scientific development is really high, there are more facilities in communities than they were in the past and the development in the culture of our societies, I strongly disagree with that statement.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transportations'' or 'transportation's'?
Suggestion: transportations'; transportation's
...cilities such as more road, more public transportations means and so on. Take my city, for exam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, really, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55089446415 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471291866029 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9305945343 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245465314772 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763677613708 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738049205286 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145310450307 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048566706506 0.0645574589148 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.