Each company has specific needs during its presence and as a result, new expectations might emerge during the time. In order to respond to these needs, they have two options, either recruit new employees or ask their current employees to enable themselves by going to university. Obviously, going to university needs financial support which I believe the company should pay for it.
Although recruiting new workers may seems more cost effective at first, but the company actually should spend more in this case because the new workforce need a whole new training before they can start working at the company. The newcomers need time to get used to their new work environment and know their co-workers. The initial training program takes time and money which is quite high while it is not clear if they want to stay after their training. So, it is more cost efficient for employers to spend money on their current employees.
The older employees are also more reliable since they have been in the company before and have shown their capabilities, so they deserve the companies' investing. Consider a car factory that needs a designer with the understanding to work with the new car making methods which are coming to the car industry. If they employ a new designer, he or she doesn't know companies' objectives, so he may not be able to answer to the demands in first place. While a person who has worked there for years, completely understands the companies' atmosphere and he or she could grab essential materials from university lectures. Therefore, this worker can bring new methods to the company according to its demands.
All in all, investing on a worker who put his life in a company or agency is a more plausible way than hiring someone new with desired education.
- TPO 40 85
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 60
- Monitoring or observing children while they are playing with their friends is an effective way to solve children's misbehavior problem. 83
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?-A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner (s 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...f they employ a new designer, he or she doesnt know companies objectives, so he may no...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...e for years, completely understands the companies atmosphere and he or she could grab ess...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90066225166 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61310942409 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0886539816 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.846153846 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155044491313 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614408264913 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516312631598 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985078463086 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447352863157 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.