Nowadays, there is no doubt that education plays a pivotal role in societies and people's lives. But the controversial point is whether today's education due to wasting time by studens on techological devices like cell phone or video games is more difficult or it was a harder task in the past. Although some people tend to believe the former one, I believe in the latter one. Accordingly, in what follows, I will try to provide some cogent reasons to support my statement.
First and foremost, it is established beyond the doubt that in the present, students are not compelled to work outside their home for a whole day, but in the past, they used to work since the morning untill the midnight. As case in point, I remember my grandfather decided to tell a true story of his life during the adolescence period. He used to work because many years ago it was a tradition that boys had to work along their father and girls had to work at home and help their mother. He also expressed that he had permission to study just till the sixth grade. When I compare him to myself, I see that I have studied undergarduate however i am going to be more educated during the master degree. This issue taught me, Had I educated long time ago, I would not had studied more than sixth grade at last.
The other equally important point is that young people are more facilitated by techology to be educated. There are a lot of schools in my country that teach their students by technological devices like tablets, video projectors, and etc. I remeber last year I hired in an elementary school to teach students the math. At the same time, I was teaching in other school by modern devices the same lessons. But, at the end of the term, second group learnd math much better than the first.
For the matter of coonclusion, I think it is now clear why education in the modern life is much easier than in the past. Although it was just the story in a nutshell, and definitely, there are more reasons supporting that, but, for the matter of brevity, I think the mentioned reasons are enough. In the end, according to the importance of educations' role in the societies, I recommend that my country allocate more resouces to teaching young students, which are wealthful for the future.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TPO-37- Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets (dogs, cats, or other animals), although there are better uses for this money.Use specific reasons and examples t 60
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement? successful people try new thing and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.use reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- summarize 3
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...established beyond the doubt that in the present, students are not compelled to w...
^^
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...at I have studied undergarduate however i am going to be more educated during the...
^
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...d I educated long time ago, I would not had studied more than sixth grade at last. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...devices like tablets, video projectors, and etc. I remeber last year I hired in an eleme...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, i think, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56063073315 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528395061728 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8733094711 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166764323643 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481054914777 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531584656689 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10114932922 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446047636892 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.