Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
When it comes to issue of the ability to success in the future job require the relation with other people over the studying hard in school, some people may agree with this statement and give us sound reasons for their beliefs. On the other hand, some other people might disagree with this idea and have different opinions. Also, those opponents could provide us with strong purposes to support their thoughts. I believe that the ability to relate with other people is more important than studying hard in school in order to get good job in future because there are so many reasons support my point of view. This short essay will demonstrate some points regarding this issue in the following paragraph:
First of all, in my opinion, it is widely understood the importance of the relation with other people for succession in the future job. The competition between people in all the job fields are increased recently. And in order to win this competition we need to gain from the experience of the other people. The relation with other people will help us to learn well from their own experience and eventually we will improve ourselves.
Another reason why I advocate the attitude of the relation importance for the success in the future job is the additional chance that we will get. The life is so rapid nowadays and getting new chance need many things beside our scientific knowledge for instance, we have to know how to communicate with different type of people. the variety in the relation that we have with different type of people we improve our ability to communicate with different type of people and such thing we can not learn it from the school.
Finally, it is a well-establish fact that with our relation with other they may offer a great job for us. Many people have the same resume but the good chance will be just for few of them. so, to get this chance we have to increase our relation with many people whom will help us in the future.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw a conclusion that says, people who hold opposite idea may have the right to believe in that, but my opinion and other people’s opinions are overwhelmingly to much to be ignored.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...municate with different type of people. the variety in the relation that we have wi...
^^^
Line 8, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... resume but the good chance will be just for few of them. so, to get this chance ...
^^
Line 8, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...d chance will be just for few of them. so, to get this chance we have to increase...
^^
Line 9, column 217, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ople's opinions are overwhelmingly to much to be ignored.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, regarding, so, well, for instance, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70284237726 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45543850826 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452196382429 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365253648163 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138224858933 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113564012582 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19847401838 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113251036978 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.