Nowadays, we are living in a society in which people are using different technology to contact each other or to do their duties. The advent of technology brought changes in people living style, for example in the past people are used letter to communicate each other, after invention of phones there letters completely removed. Personally, I believe that people should research about a phenomenon due to be well informed. I feel this way for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
First, to find a trustful resource. As we know, people for being well-known and becoming popular would broadcast wrong information about an event or puzzle. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I remember when I was 12 years old, I was searching about culture of Afghanistan people for my language project. I had found from a site some nugatory points about our culture, it was astonishing for me. However, when I asked my professor about this issue, he guide me and send me some other references which I could find the correct answer of my question.
Secondly, searching a lot means higher information about an issue, which help us to predict the different perception of something. For instance, when I was working on my monograph, I was not familiar with my topic, in was new for me and the professors were in mind of asking tough question from students. I had about 5 antagonist in our class and score was so important for me. Therefore, I started searching about my subject and within a month I read more than 20 research which was conducted from different countries. This forgave me higher intensity and helped me to have more confidence among my rivals.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that seeking for one motif from many resources help people to be aware of the circumstance, and be open of something would run people for a bright future. Abundant information about a phenomenon would render people to an accurate sequence and would enhance the validity of their researches.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 70
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 70
- TPO 31 Integrated Writing Task 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'guides'.
Suggestion: guides
...asked my professor about this issue, he guide me and send me some other references wh...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'antagonist' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'antagonists'.
Suggestion: antagonists
...h question from students. I had about 5 antagonist in our class and score was so important...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85131195335 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78733668713 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556851311953 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8199782444 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8823529412 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105128725396 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386463265141 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035573844267 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689281433142 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131506030124 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.