Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, by progressing the technology new devices are invented in any industry. The car production is one of the most noteworthy industries that are developing every year. New cars with new features that facilitate driving for people. However, using lots of cars in a city has problems. People will be used fewer cars than before in the future, Although the number of cars is increasing in the world. As far as I am concerned, I agree with above statement because of the air pollution and traffic jams which have a negative effect on people's life.
The first reason of current discussion is air pollution which is dangerous for people's health. In this regard, the research showed that one of the momentous reasons of pollution in the word is about the CO2 gasses that different cars spread in the air. By being aware of this situation, all countries try to control this pollution by eliminating the cars. There are different methods in the transportation system to decrease the number of cars. For instance, In some countries such as Germany, by making bicycle routes more than car routes in different cities, people are encouraged to use a bicycle rather than a car. This causes decreasing of cars in these cities that help to have clean air. Therefore, pollution is a considerable reason for having few cars to use in the future.
Another substantial reason is about the traffic that causes many problems in people's life. In this case, it should be noted that traffic not only causes people to be nervous but also is a reason for delaying in their daily activities. So, countries try to omit traffic jams in their streets. One of the methods to reach this goal is promoting people to do not use their cars. For example, in developed cities such as New York or Tokyo, there are public transportation routes on land or air that different buses move on them. This is faster and safer than using cars for people. Thus, people do not their cars in these cities and traffic jams as well as the number of cars will be decreased. So, traffic is a reason for having few cars to use in the future.
In conclusion, we discussed air pollution and traffic jams that are two facets will lead to being fewer cars to use in the future. It sounds logical to say that it never happens for us to use our cars no time, but it is an appropriate idea to use them when it is vital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 53
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 18 3
- tpo 11 76
- Some people prefer to buy their meals in restaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in a restaurant.Which one would you choose and why? 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60756501182 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53257590707 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446808510638 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2404647978 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7391304348 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3913043478 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258932002685 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880189049016 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688811731958 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188081898307 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400300521864 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.