Children's education has attracted much social concern. Some pedagogical specialists believe that parents nowadays have more control over their children's education. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is the development of the world. The fact is that the advancement of the societies goes along with the better living condition and higher income of people. Therefore, it is possible for parents nowadays to be more affordable with a variety of studying methods such as tutoring, online learning, etc. As a result, they tend to have the desire of guiding and providing their children with the best support in education. Consequently, it plays a vital role in proving that the cultivation of the world stimulates the involvement of parents in their children's education. More importantly, it cannot be denied that the development of communities creates chances for parents to have wider horizons. It leads to the fact that they are more aware of the importance of education to their children's future. On that ground, needless to say, they are supposed to be motivated to put more effort into directing their children in suitable studying ways. As a consequence, parents are certain to take more control over their children's education. By and large, the modification of the world actually promotes parents' orientation on their kids' study.
On the other hand, some people might say that parents nowadays are too busy with their work. Accordingly, they have less time to interact and take participation in their children's education. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that companies always have plans to regulate the number of tasks for more appropriate to their employees. It follows that parents always can schedule their work effectively and spend time with their children. Furthermore, the advancement of technologies stands a golden chance for the appearances of many modern communicating methods. Correspondingly, it is apparent that parents are bound to connect with their children more easily and have an eye on them every time even when they are far away from each other. For this reason, it is expected to encourage parents to take more involvement in many aspects of their children's lives, especially education. Subsequently, the development of societies greatly stimulates the participation of parents on children's study. Beyond any doubt, the idea that modern life separate parents from their children is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidences supporting my agreement. It is highly likely recommended that people should take my writing into careful consideration to make a suitable decision on raising children.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 7 Independent task 64
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important characteristic to a successful politician or leader is good communication skills 90
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30909090909 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98411427672 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 734.4 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6709583057 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.44 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.24 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294782904996 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091441162541 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626901949734 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171810472172 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861556330258 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.