There is some disagreement over whether accepting the criticism from others is a necessary condition for being successful in a group. Of course, few would say that this condition is not a requirement to succeed at working places. From my view, however, ignoring the valuable feedback from others, even they are not positive, can be problematic to people who want to become a successful person in a society because of the benefit in finding and solve our problems and the importance of our social skills.
To begin, it is undeniable that criticism from others can be an effective way to figure out and improve our problems because people cannot easily recognize their own problems themselves. When it comes to a leader in a group who tends to ignore the group members’ views that are negative against the leader’s opinion, the leader cannot his or her own problems or the group’s problems to prevent to make a profit. Without having an attention about the criticism from the members, the leader cannot be successful. For instance, Steve Jobs, a leader of Apple, if he did not confirm others’ opinions about his decisions, he could not figure out his own problems to have an negative influence on the management of the company but also the company could not become a successful company. This implies that an inclination to admit criticism from others is crucial to people who want to become a vital member of a group.
Furthermore, the limitation of contradicting of disagreements of others can be found in terms of having advanced social skills, which is advantageous to succeed in a society. Regard to the modern society where there is no task can be done by a single person, the social abilities are necessary qualifications for any successful person. In this regard, when people are able to accept disagreements from others with their ideas in a group, it will allow them to enhance their social abilities which can be helpful in building a more promising future. According to a study conducted by researchers of a team at Harvard University, responses of the employees in a large company revealed that the employees who tended to accept disagreements of others had higher scores from their coworkers than others who tended to ignore them. Furthermore, the employees also made better outputs in their works. This shows that in order to succeed in a group or society, people have to recognize the importance of disagreements of others.
To sum, despite of the merit of having positive mind when people have criticism from others, both the vital role of criticism in finding and improving personal problems and the fact that social skills are necessary qualifications for any successful person in modern society tell us that it is advantageous that people are able to confirm criticism from others about them to being successful.
- "To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Government should focus its budgets more on environmental protection than on economy.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Essay topics: Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline. 73
- integrated task: salvage logging benefits 80
- 58 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Although science and technology will continue to improve the most significant improvement for the quality of people s lives have already taken place 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 686, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...not figure out his own problems to have an negative influence on the management of...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'for instance', 'of course']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240075614367 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.149338374291 0.158761421928 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0831758034026 0.0866891130778 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0302457466919 0.046263068375 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047258979206 0.0685040099705 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137996219282 0.118717715034 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0321361058601 0.0351676179071 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89063134704 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.047258979206 0.0309702414327 153% => OK
Particles: 0.00378071833648 0.00188951952338 200% => OK
Determiners: 0.105860113422 0.0887237588012 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0226843100189 0.0209618222197 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0226843100189 0.0139019557991 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2855.0 2387.08602151 120% => OK
No of words: 475.0 408.028673835 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01052631579 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.338922669872 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275789473684 0.251872472559 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189473684211 0.174417080927 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138947368421 0.112833075102 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89063134704 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435789473684 0.524397521467 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.7507071207 59.2087087015 82% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 31.6666666667 20.5533526081 154% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.7220313961 48.84282405 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.333333333 120.699889404 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 20.5533526081 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.533333333333 0.644075263715 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 59.2456140351 45.7405998639 130% => OK
Elegance: 1.80833333333 1.45489161554 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37440947247 0.300154397459 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.168286026414 0.103427244359 163% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0710118013365 0.0752933317313 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.57482966141 0.497263757937 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167814919252 0.151897553556 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178902266707 0.114077575197 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689898858671 0.0781384742642 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.439505323287 0.336927656856 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0306043289996 0.067059652881 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283673947941 0.210909579961 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287647728513 0.0618886996521 46% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 13.6433691756 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.