Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past
Politicians and their decisions have had critical impacts on human societies. But their impacts don’t seem to have a steady trend during the time. In some conditions, such as when a country has an argument with another country, politics get more attention, but in other situations that there is not any dispute in the higher level of authorities, people show a fewer level of attraction to politics. Students as an important part of each society, not only are not apart from the other people in that society, but also have an important effect on others’ thoughts. But In my opinion, their interests in politics, as other people, change regarding public conditions. These changes do not necessarily follow a decreasing or increasing pattern. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons which can aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
The most important reason that attracts students (and of course other people) to politics is its role in their current and future life. When there is a condition that authorities should decide an important decision about the future of a society, students are more motivated to follow political arguments. For example, a couple years ago, when the United Kingdom decided to exit from United Europe, there was a high contention between proponents and opponents. In that time, students from both parties came to the streets and declared their opinions. There are also other important decisions that strictly change people’s lives in a society such as the decision to participate in a war or not.
Another reason that attracts students’ attention to political events is awareness of what that currently over on their country and other countries. When there is no information about the inside and outside of a society, there wouldn’t be any attraction to politic. But, when we access to this informations, there would be a motivation to participate in political events such as elections. Today, advances in communication technologies help us to get more and more about what happens in the world of politics. Therefore, it causes a positive effect on students’ tendency to politics.
Unlike the second reason, my third reason has a negative effect on students’ attitude toward politics. Technology progressions such as social networks, network games, virtual realities, and other stuff have brought us attractive things that students prefer to spend more time on them rather on following political events. A few years ago, a network game named clash of clans introduced to the market. In that time, I saw many young people played that game. Most of them were students. They were so attracted in the game that they even hardly had enough time for their courses. In that conditions, no one expected those students get attracted to politics.
In conclusion, students’ attraction to politics changes over time. The most important reason that causes students and other people to follow politics is its effect on their current and future life. There are other reasons that some of them attract students to politics such as awareness of political events and their effects, and some other reasons that have negative effects on students’ political motivation such as technology advances that cause students have fewer time for politics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: There are other; There are also
...he streets and declared their opinions. There are also other important decisions that strictly chang...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tion to politic. But, when we access to this informations, there would be a motivati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, apart from, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2797.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 529.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28733459357 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89972839833 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446124763705 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 877.5 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1297195253 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.592592593 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5925925926 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166065496371 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516198790676 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433060980929 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108388152602 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261359734187 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.