It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human beings have always been involved in a great struggle to be honest with their family members and friends because it actually creates trust between them and strengthen their relationships. Whereas some people debate that people should always be honest with each other and tell the truth, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that integrity is a great personality; however, it is not sometimes probable to be honest with your friend thoroughly. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second metal attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by the underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To commence with, it is no secret to anyone that integrity as well as honesty engender trust between two individuals and make their relationship considerably strong. Nevertheless, sometimes in order to keep your friendship still strong you need to do not tell the exact words to your friends. This is because if you want to talk about your true feeling toward the subject to him, your word may bother him and destroy your friendship. An example can significantly shed some light on this subject. Several years ago, my girlfriend told me that she did not purchase my birthday’ gift herself. This issue was really annoyable for me because I thought she has spent much time to select and but that gorgeous gift. Under such a circumstance, if she did not tell me the truth, nothing would have happened and now I can trust her as well in all situation.
Furthermore, one of the most exquisite and momentous points is that all persons have always several secrets and personal information in their hectic life which do not like to talk about them or share with other individuals. In such a situation, it would be better not to speak about those issues and tell the truth because it may annoy their friends or family member. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. I have a disastrous disease congenital and do not prefer to talk about it. This is because I think when somebody hears about my catastrophic problem, he will definitely get depressed and disappointed. Consequently, when they ask me about why we shall repeat any subject twice, I laugh and say sorry, I had concentrated on your words.
In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of the opinion that it is more imperative to be sometime honest with the persons around you rather than telling the truth all times. This is because perhaps the truth will get them upset and also ruin your friendship.
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TOEFL T P O 32 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding persons'?
Suggestion: the surrounding persons
...e imperative to be sometime honest with the persons around you rather than telling the truth all times...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, then, well, whereas, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95132743363 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86075549437 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4722048425 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.789473684 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7894736842 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235290378542 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638661513513 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683043189352 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146451609182 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539151852404 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.