Do you agree or disagree? A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Some people believe that a teacher is worthy only when a teacher posses a great knowledge of the subject they teach because unless a teacher is proficient in its field, the teacher will not be able to convey proper knowledge to the student. However, I strongly disagree to the above statement. Infact, I believe that a teacher should be focused on the students rather than being expert of the subject for the following two reasons.
First of all, focusing on students is more important than having detailed knowledge of the subject because a teacher's primary job is to make sure all the students understand what is being taught. Sometimes a simple subject become tougher for the subject though it is being taught by the doctorate. For example , In college I had a subject theory of computation and it seemed really hard to me though the teacher held a doctorate in theory of computation. Then, I went to other teacher who very friendly with students and he taught me so well that I started liking the subject. On the other side if the teacher focuses only on the content teaching oblivious of students ability to grasp the content then there is no use of teaching. So, a teacher's involvement with the student is more important.
Secondly, focusing on students will attract student towards studies because teacher's attention towards student will result in attention of the student towards studies which will lead to higher score. For instance, there was a boy in my class who used to fail in mathematics, he didn't understand mathematics at all even after being taught by highly qualified teacher. Then , he joined coaching , there the sessions were so interactive that at the end of the semester he scored 90 percent score. Thus, it is because of the teachers attention the boy was able to score good marks in the examination.
Thus ,the ability of teacher is analyzed on the basis on how well they interact with a student, only possessing bookish language won't suffice to be a good teacher.
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 79
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a teacher' or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: a teacher; teachers
...tailed knowledge of the subject because a teachers primary job is to make sure all the stu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing taught by the doctorate. For example , In college I had a subject theory of co...
^^
Line 2, column 738, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...then there is no use of teaching. So, a teachers involvement with the student is more im...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ass who used to fail in mathematics, he didnt understand mathematics at all even afte...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...taught by highly qualified teacher. Then , he joined coaching , there the sessions...
^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ified teacher. Then , he joined coaching , there the sessions were so interactive ...
^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...rcent score. Thus, it is because of the teachers attention the boy was able to score goo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ore good marks in the examination. Thus ,the ability of teacher is analyzed on th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82748538012 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62347824486 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505847953216 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3615499591 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375903010418 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13826397773 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861464158863 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239013940629 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962213607577 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.