Essay topics: TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Under the circumstances described in the issue, I would definitely prefer to talk the leader after the end of the meeting because this approach has no glaring disadvantages but has serious advantages over other proposed options. The reasons on which my prospect is based will be discussed in details below.
Firstly, my opinion about a mistake may be incorrect and in order not to be ashamed I would prefer to wait till the end of the meeting and then discuss my viewpoint on the issue with the speaker. There are several possibilities, for instance, I might misunderstand speaker's words, I may have a wrong opinion which is based on obsolete information or, of course, the leader may be mistaken as well. Due to those options it is reasonable and wise to take a time and discuss the supposed mistake without people.
Secondly, the second option is better because it will not inevitably lead to spoiling relationships with the speaker or undermining his authority. By discussing the problem without witnesses the position of the leader will not be compromised. By contrast, interrupting the speaker in the middle of the meeting in front of the public who ought to obey his rule will definitely subvert the leader's authority and it may lead to a change in the leader's attitude to the person who corrected him. It is needless to say that this is undesirable outcome for the person who works under the leader because of conspicuous reasons.
Finally, keep silence is not a good option either because the leader may be unaware about the mistake but in some cases saying nothing may lead to grave and dire consequences for the speaker and even for the success of the company. For instance, we all heart about debacle of Samsung’s Note 7 smartphone, it is believed that one of the reason of the commercial disaster is stiff hierarchical structure of Korean society when employees are terrified to openly talk up to the boss and saying nothing about the mistake in the design led to the millions of dollars in losses. At the same time, having a conversation about the mistake may have easily annihilated the possible negative outcome for the corporation. Thus it is not only an option but a duty to talk to a responsible person about a noticed mistake.
Due to aforementioned ground, approaching of a meeting leader after the meeting is the most attractive, beneficial and reasonable option among ones which were stated in the issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-15 | amirakhlaghiqqq | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | MiladHakimi | 3 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc."A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks ar 80
- 20.09.2017 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 63
- Today more people are traveling than ever before Why is this the case What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller 84
- 08 11 2017 You recently noticed a local restaurant that was offering a part time job Write a letter to the restaurant s manager In your letter explain that you would like to apply for the job give some details of any relevant experience that you have spec 82
- 27/10/2017 Nowadays plastic money replacements such as credit and debit cards are extremely popular, even more than banknotes and coins. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. Include your personal opinion and examples based on your own experie 75
Comments
Essay evaluation report
one of the reason
one of the reasons
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 27 in 30
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 415 350
No. of Characters: 1982 1500
No. of Different Words: 204 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.513 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.776 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.767 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 148 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.643 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.568 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.362 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.624 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.115 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Hello, my reader.
Hello, my reader.
I have a question. How can I take the most out of e-reader estimation? it there instruction how to interpret the results? I would like to use all available resourses to improve my score but I really hardly can understand what e-reader's report mean.
Thank you.
The e-grader is based on the
The e-grader is based on the technology of machine learning with the average value of 20,000 essays. for example:
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
The first number: 415 means there are 415 words in this essay, while most users have about 408 words in one essay (the second number ).
if the first number is too big or too small, the e-grader will consider something wrong with the essay and may give penalties. for example, e-grader will give warning messages:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
Remember that 'the penalties' are the result of 'compromise'. Because the e-grader has to consider all levels of users. It is unfair for some users like you who argued well still got those messages. So what will you do when you see those messages?
1. Check out if you have same messages in other essays. If you see them again and again, they are potentially issues.
2. Check out how human graders say something. If human graders give same messages, it means it is serious, if not, it means it is not serious and you can simply ignore them. The e-grader actually can't cover all aspects of essays in all levels. for example, in those 20,000 essays, few essays can argue as good as this essay. Then the e-grader just doesn't have any ideas on what to do with this situation.
The e-grader is in a new version and it doesn't have a lot of documents ready. The technical team is working on them hardly. For you, as we told, you are now top TOEFL writers, you should not put a lot of time on writing but put precious time on other weak sections like speaking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ey his rule will definitely subvert the leaders authority and it may lead to a change i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...rity and it may lead to a change in the leaders attitude to the person who corrected hi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 715, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e negative outcome for the corporation. Thus it is not only an option but a duty to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e option among ones which were stated in the issue.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for instance, of course, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89397590361 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85418202972 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503614457831 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5079915614 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.071428571 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6428571429 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128730275023 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462728857238 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300916939081 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776818557653 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204498258083 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.