The food we eat is much healthier than the past.
We are living in a sophisticated age food has a profound impact on our today's tough life. People are always trying to make their lives healthier, convenient and delightful. Some people believe that the food we eat is not healthier than the past, while others are convinced the food we eat has better quality than the past. After carefully pondering it from several aspects, I do strongly agree with the latter idea. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
First of all, it is undoubted that thank to progression in technology, people are using beneficial food. As a matter of fact, medical care has a better quality and they have an incredible control on food people consume. To illustrate this fact, one needs only refer to numerous medical center which control the ingredient using in preparation of food. Although the some restaurants such as fast food serve plenty of fatty food, what results from controlling of their cooking procedure are to enhance of value of the food. The noteworthy intelligible results, which conducted in our country, show that the low percentage of death rate of people due to consuming unhealthy food compared to people living in the past.
The second reason why I agree with it is that, obviously, a great deal of documentaries and magazines make people knowledgeable. In fact, they know which group of food are healthy and which group of food brings them bad consequences. The modern world offer abundant example of people who are graduated in the fields of food science which assist people to experience better life and consume healthy food. Hence, were I be a determiner in our country, I would have increased the number of centers where provide much more information for people to have a longer life. There is a well-known proverb in Persian, the equivalent of which in English may sound like this" the more people be aware about what they eat, the less they would be sick".
TO make a long story short, no one can deny the enormous positive effect of today's condition to assist people better life than the past. Not only is their lifetime longer, but also their awareness bring them several lucrative consequences. For this reason, I highly recommend that most people increase the hours of studying magazine relating to food science.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-23 | SHAHRIYAR | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-21 | saharhh | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | zabanfinish | 70 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | zabanfinish | 70 | view |
- Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Somepeople believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them topay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cau 81
- Young people should try different jobs before they decide which job or career they will choose in the long term. 76
- Some young people have free time in the evenings after school or on days off from school Which of the following activities would be most beneficial for young people ages 14 18 to do in their spare time Why Gaining practical work experience either at a par 77
- What would a new comer like and dislike about your town 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Movies and televisionhave more negative effects than positive effects on the way young peoplebehave. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ng in preparation of food. Although the some restaurants such as fast food serve ple...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, well, while, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93924050633 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6593077975 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53417721519 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3031344686 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.388888889 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302960481661 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906778155934 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139636752554 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191588085156 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133997411226 0.0645574589148 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.