Having opposite view with teacher is a common incident in a class. Some individuals believe that it is a good way to say nothing and do not correcting the teacher. However, others believe otherwise. In my opinion correcting teacher do have negative impact on teacher's behavior. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First, correcting meeting leader is an impolite behavior. When you tell your opposite view to the lecturer, she would feel that she has not enough information about the idea and may found it impolite. My experience about one of my teachers is a good case in point. When I was studying my undergraduate, I had a teacher who was a knowledgeable and kind person. I remember one day when we were in an ecologic class, our teacher said something incorrect in John's view but he said nothing and never corrected her. In the next session, our teacher corrected her mistake and apologized. Another day, she made other mistake and my friend Jaime corrected her this time. This circumstance made her feel upset and embarrassed because she thought my friend's action was impolite and inappropriate. This example clearly illustrates that correcting teacher is not a polite behavior.
Second, pointing out teacher's mistake change her view and attitude about the student who does it. If you tell to the lecturer that she made a mistake and correct her, she could not think of you as before and change her mind about you. For example, I remember when I was studying in my graduate University two years ago, I had a professor who was a genius and proud gay. One day one his class while he was explaining the lesson which I had studied and had trained before. She mentioned a point wrongly which I noticed, therefore, I corrected her but not only he did not accept my idea but he also became upset. After this event, he never behaved me as kind as before. As you see, this instance showed that mentioning teachers' fault would change their approach about anyone does this.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that remarking teachers' wrong points in the class have a negative impact for two reasons. It not only seems an impolite manner but also causes teachers change their view about the student who correct them.
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 70
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 83
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 36 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ting teacher do have negative impact on teachers behavior. I feel this way for two reaso...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78260869565 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60823675819 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488491048593 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4358349695 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3043478261 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192180429866 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638453417272 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493018327054 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126700912846 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045395140215 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.