Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Information which is introduce during class or meeting has vital role in shaping people belief. People attending in a meeting spend their valuable time to learn something novel to use in their life. Some people believe that if teachers or leaders give wrong information during class, it is better to not show any react, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude, in my view, it is beneficial to correct the speakers mistakes right away for two remarkable reasons.
The main reason is that by correcting the leader mistakes immediately, people don't get wrong information. In today's progressive world, when people or students attend in a somewhere to increase their knowledge, it is important to them to get information which worth the time they spend there. Getting the wrong data during presentations could confused people and deprive them from listening the rest of the presentation. Also, they want to use this knowledge in future for various parts such as their exams, finding jobs, and so on, so the accuracy of the information present in a meeting is important. For example, when I was in university, I had a class with one of the university's well-known professors. One session he did an obvious mistake in solving a math problem. All the student got confused and start whispering about it which distracted my concentration, hence I decided to tell my professor and didn't wait more. My professor reacted very kindly and tanked me to remind him his mistakes. In final exam we have one question from this part and all of students write it correctly. If I weren't correct his mistake immediately, we would get wrong knowledge.
Second, allow one mistake to continue could cause bigger mistakes. Some people base their work on the result of later information they get. Therefore, it is possible to do a big mistakes unconsciousness only because of wrong knowledge you get. For instance, the statistics demonstrate that correcting mistakes immediately avoid people from experiencing other serious mistakes. Researchers' investigation among to class reveals that students who attend in class that wrong information doesn't correct right away make wrong decisions more frequently due to base some of their crucial decisions on this data they get. Furthermore, the incorrect knowledge leads them to experience hard failures which has bad effect on their health. As you can see, correcting mistakes right away has a lot of advantages.
In conclusion, I do believe that the advantages of correcting somebody immediately overweight the benefits of waiting or saying nothing. Not only people get wrong information, but they also experience bigger mistake since the first mistake continue without correction. I think people should react to mistakes during meetings.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements？ Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- : Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'introduced'.
Suggestion: introduced
Information which is introduce during class or meeting has vital role ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the leader mistakes immediately, people dont get wrong information. In todays progre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'confuse'
Suggestion: confuse
...e wrong data during presentations could confused people and deprive them from listening ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 907, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ence I decided to tell my professor and didnt wait more. My professor reacted very ki...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1094, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ll of students write it correctly. If I werent correct his mistake immediately, we wou...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ey get. Therefore, it is possible to do a big mistakes unconsciousness only because o...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 484, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... attend in class that wrong information doesnt correct right away make wrong decisions...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2404494382 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89958531529 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532584269663 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7390249049 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.391304348 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.347826087 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52173913043 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198786949472 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605014192312 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491748667678 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137102187348 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393432271381 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.