Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that young people who choose a job that it is similar to their parents' job obtain several advantages over their counterparts who do not have this chance. If children have a realistic view of the life they surely select the same job with their parents. Contrary to this popular belief there are still those who argue that young people should just think about their interest not make a decision based on its benefits to them. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that it is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than choose jobs that are very different from their parents' job.
First and foremost, parents are able to help their children to find a more appropriate and safe job, if children select the same job as them. Today, all people know that unfortunately having a relationship with powerful people is the most important factor for finding a good job position. Separate of its negative side, because parents work in this field for a long time, as a result of this familiarity they have lots of friends among company managers who could assist their children to find a great job. In addition, during children study at the university parents can provide an opportunity for getting an internship for the children that would be helpful for their resumes, and also they could improve their skills in their field of study.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that when children are a practitioner in a similar field with their parents they will be got an assist from their parents at the worse time. It can happen for anyone that sometimes works did not move in its true way, because of economic failures or some unintentional faults. In this condition who can help a person better than its parents whose will kindly try to find a solution for problems. Moreover, during the study at the university parents can take a hand to their children in the difficult courses. For example, one of my friends studied chemical engineering like her mothers' field. Her mother is very brilliant in this field and she was very helpful to her in special courses.
Finally, yet importantly, children could be used their parents' experiences to avoid from the same mistake in their jobs. Children can take advice from their compassionate parents about issues such as choose a company for collaboration and confident able colleagues. These kinds of advice would be really practical to prevent from repeating similar mistakes and saving time. For example, in collaboration with a business company, we can identify the person who is not very honest with other ones.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that it is better for children to choose jobs that it is similar to their parents' jobs. Because parents could provide them with a better job opportunity, aid during failures times and valuable advice.
- TPO INTEGRATED ELEPHANTS BEHAVIORS 51 66
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 83
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their community 76
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo 40 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...unterparts who do not have this chance. If children have a realistic view of the l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8877755511 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5408925035 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462925851703 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.332320501 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.95 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.95 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515543164788 0.236089414692 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180694168324 0.076458572812 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164644794039 0.0737576698707 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336016370759 0.150856017488 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119563077036 0.0645574589148 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.