Learning is a life long process. There is no limit or exact time to learn. Books are the thing that helps us to understand or learn anything in the world. It depends on us, how will we learn. Some people think that everything that we want to learn is contained in books whereas others think there is a vast matter left to learn. I think not everything that is learned is contained in books.
First of all, books are the place where we can learn the only theoretical things. We may learn about the politics of the United States from books. But, to really understand, we must practice politics. Books only provide the basic thing of anything but, we have to learn how it works. For instance, anyone can learn complicated mathematics related to building a rocket. But, it is not enough. In order to learn or understand one must have to build a rocket. I heard a popular story about practical learning is about riding a bicycle. Two friends want to ride a bicycle; one stated trying to ride; another started to read a book about how it works. By the time when the second one finished the book the first one already learned how to ride it. So, sometimes, it is important to learn practically. For this matter, books would not help.
Second, books maybe help to enhance someone's knowledge but, it will not give the experience. Sometimes, it is important to have an experience rather than just bookish knowledge. For instance, it is easy to knowledge about how to survive in a cold environment but, it might be most challenging for a person who never on snow. In order to live in those cold environments, one must have to live in those environments. Another example is traveling. Nowadays it is easy to watch any place trough youtube or travel. But, If someone travels a place, this will give him/her the real experience of how it feels or looks. Besides, traveling will increase our knowledge and our potentiality as by this means we can learn how to adjust any new environment. So, in order to gather experiance, we must go outside and explore the world.
In conclusion, in order to know how the world really works, we must go outside and gather experience. It is easy to know how it works but it's hard to deal with it.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Advances in transportation and communication like the airplane and the telephone have changed the way that nation interact with each other in a global society .Choose another technological innovation that you think is important. Give specific reasons for 68
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on repo 63
- GRE Argument:The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an ent 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, may, really, second, so, whereas, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56497563341 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4725 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3719582141 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.8965517241 100.406767564 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7931034483 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96551724138 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119613925127 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393433286438 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526034988342 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732818221824 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413341835828 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.